Advanced Search Results
Debi DIn and ors. Vs. King-emperor
Allahabad
Debi DIn and ors.
King-emperor
Sep-15-1925
Criminal
AIR1926All160
Sulaiman, J.1. Debi Din was arrested on the spot with three others, while his other companions fled away. The evidence of Nanhu has been rejected by the Judge, but the fact of his arrest cannot be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Datt Tewari Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Debi Datt Tewari
Emperor
Jul-04-1928
Criminal
AIR1928All548; 110Ind.Cas.816
Dalal, J.1. These are two appeals made by one Debi Dat from the order of the learned Sessions Judge of Kumaun refusing to complain against two persons Rudra Dat and Gauri Dat of an offence under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Debi
Emperor
Jan-04-1918
Land Acquisition
AIR1918All265; 44Ind.Cas.113
Piggott, J.1. I take what seem to me the essential facts of this case from the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge. The applicant Debi, being at the time a peon in the service of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Debi Ram Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Debi Ram
Emperor
Feb-15-1935
Criminal
157Ind.Cas.524
Kendall, J.1. The appellant, Debi Ram, has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge of Agra of an offence under Section 324, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. He has appealed, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Singh Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Debi Singh
Emperor
Jul-07-1919
Criminal
AIR1919All851(1); 52Ind.Cas.385
Piggott, J.1. The case against the appellant, Debi Singh, was that he produced a receipt for the payment of a sum of Rs. 2,340, which receipt purports on the face of it to have been signed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBimal Protiva Debi Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Bimal Protiva Debi
Emperor
Dec-05-1941
Civil
AIR1942Cal464
Lodge, J.1. This is a rule issued upon the District Magistrate of 24-Parganas to show cause why the conviction of the petitioner under Rule 39(6) of the Defence of India Rules and the sentence passed thereunder...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajeswari Debi Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Rajeswari Debi
Emperor
Jan-03-1933
Criminal
AIR1933Cal861,147Ind.Cas.1007
Rankin, C.J.1. In this case the appellant before us is a woman named Rajeswari Debi. She was put on her trial before the learned Sessions Judge of Burdwan and a jury upon a charge of murder...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Proshad Kalwar Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Debi Proshad Kalwar
Emperor
Feb-03-1932
Criminal
AIR1932Cal455
Panckridge, J.1. In this case the Rule was issued on one ground alone, namely, that in the absence of: a definite charge under Section 379/114, I. P. C., the conviction of the petitioner was improper and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Prasad Sharma Vs. Emperor
Mumbai
Debi Prasad Sharma
Emperor
Jun-25-1943
Contempt of Court
(1944)46BOMLR11
Atkin, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by which the appellants were severally found guilty of contempt of Court and sentenced to fine or imprisonment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Singh and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Debi Singh and ors.
Emperor
Jun-19-1915
Criminal
AIR1915All357; 30Ind.Cas.151
Chamier, J.1. The four applicant and five others were convicted by a Magistrate of the first Class at Etawah on what is probably one of the most remarkable charges over framed under Sections 147 and 325,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »