Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: d · Respondent: p r · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.126 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 10 2011

Dr. W.L.D.S.G. Perera Vs. P.R.P. Perera and Others

Court : Sri Lanka Supreme Court

Appellant : Dr. W.L.D.S.G. Perera

Respondent : P.R.P. Perera and Others

Decided on : Mar-10-2011

Subject : Education

Dr. Shirani A. Bandaranayake, J. The petitioner, a Senior Consultant of the Department of Secondary and Tertiary Education of the Faculty of Education, Open University of Sri Lanka (hereinafter referred to as the Open University) at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1952

D.N. Banerji Vs. P.R. Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : D.N. Banerji

Respondent : P.R. Mukherjee and ors.

Decided on : Dec-05-1952

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 132(1)

Reported in : AIR1953SC58; (1953)IMLJ195(SC); [1953]4SCR302; (1953)1LLJ195(SC)

Chandrasekhara Aiyar, J. 1. Pratul Chandra Mitra was the Head Clerk, and Phanindra Nath Ghose, the Sanitary Inspector of the Budge Budge Municipality, and they were also members of the Municipal Workers' Union. On receipt of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1996

Additional D.i.G. of Police, Hyderabad Vs. P.R.K. Mohan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Additional D.i.G. of Police, Hyderabad

Respondent : P.R.K. Mohan

Decided on : Nov-26-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 12, 3, 4; Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Section 12

Reported in : (1997)11SCC571

A.M. Ahmadi, C.J. and; Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Despite service of notice, the respondent has not chosen to enter an appearance. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The only ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 05 1975

D.R. Malhotra Vs. P.R. Chopra

Court : Delhi

Appellant : D.R. Malhotra

Respondent : P.R. Chopra

Decided on : Feb-05-1975

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14 and 39

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi203; 1975RLR309

B.C. Misra, J. (1) D. R. Malhotra, the tenant ha.s filed this second appeal under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 59 of 1958 (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'), against the appellate orderof Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1999

D.V. Jaganathan and Five Others Vs. P.R. Srinivasan and Five Others

Court : Chennai

Appellant : D.V. Jaganathan and Five Others

Respondent : P.R. Srinivasan and Five Others

Decided on : Aug-09-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 100 and 103

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC263

ORDER1. This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned II Additional City Civil Judge, Madras, in A.S.No. 286 of 1992 confirming the judgment of the learned 12th Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2017

D vs.p @ R

Court : Delhi

Appellant : D

Respondent : P @ R

Decided on : Dec-15-2017

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. 12.2017 * % + MAT.APP.(F.C) 161/2017 D ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vijay Malik, Advocate with Mr. P @ R Jogminder Rana, Advocate. Versus ..... Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2009

The District Collector and the Inspector of Police, C.S.C.i.D. Vs. P.R ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : The District Collector and the Inspector of Police, C.S.C.i.D.

Respondent : P.R.S. Traders Rep. by Its Proprietor R. Parthasarathy and the Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Su

Decided on : Nov-06-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1984 - Sections 6B; Tamil Nadu Essential Trade Articles (Regulation of Trade) Order, 1984; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A; Tamil Nadu Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution by Card System) Order, 1982; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1015

R. Banumathi, J.1. Challenge in this Appeal is the order of the learned single Judge setting aside the order of confiscation of seized rice bags and directing the Government to pay the market value of rice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2000

D. Srinivasa Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P., P.R. and R.D. (Pts Iii) D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Appellant : D. Srinivasa Rao and ors.

Respondent : State of A.P., P.R. and R.D. (Pts Iii) Dept. and anr.

Decided on : Nov-24-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 87, 89, 95 and 268; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 4 to 12, 13(1), 15 and 15(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Panchayat Raj Rent Act, 1974; State Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1985; Northern India Ferries Act - Sections 19 and 23; Essential Commodities Act; Constitution of India (Third Amendment) Act, 1954; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act - Sections 6(2); Andhra Pradesh Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1966 - Rule 9, 9V and 9W; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Auction of Sand in the Water Courses vesting in Gram Panchayat) Rules, 2000; Sikkim State Civil Service Rules, 1977 - Rules 4(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 162 and 166(3)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALT75

G. Bikshapathy, J.1. Both the Writ Petitions can be disposed of by a common judgment.2. In these Writ Petitions, the constitutional validity of G.O.Ms. No. 71 issued by the Government, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (PTS-III),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2005

D.D.A. and anr. Vs. K.R. Builders P. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : D.D.A. and anr.

Respondent : K.R. Builders P. Ltd.

Decided on : Mar-01-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 129 - Order 8, Rule 1; Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1967 - Rule 3

Reported in : III(2005)BC511; 119(2005)DLT196; 2005(81)DRJ708

B.A. Khan, J.1. This appeal raises two interesting questions:- Whether Rule 3 of Chapter of 6 of Delhi High Court (Original Side Rules), 1967 empowered the Court to extend time for filing a written statement beyond...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1935

D.K. Mohammad Ehiya Sahib Vs. R.M.P.V.M. Valliappa Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Appellant : D.K. Mohammad Ehiya Sahib

Respondent : R.M.P.V.M. Valliappa Chettiar

Decided on : Dec-10-1935

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 163Ind.Cas.2246; (1936)70MLJ708

Stone, J.1. In this appeal the first defendant is the appellant. There is also a Memorandum of Cross Objections filed by the plaintiff-respondent. The suit, O.S. No. 8 of 1930, in the Court of the District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial