Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Bombay Vs. L. Armstrong Smith.
Mumbai
Commissioner of Income-tax Bombay
L. Armstrong Smith.
Mar-07-1946
Direct Taxation
[1946]14ITR606(Bom)
STONE, C.J. - This is a reference under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act. The question referred to us is :-'Whether on the facts of the case the sum of Rs. 48,000 received by the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner Vs. Smith
US Supreme Court
Commissioner
Smith
Apr-09-1945
Land Acquisition
Commissioner v. Smith - 324 U.S. 695 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Commissioner v. Smith, 324 U.S. 695 (1945) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Smith No. 371 Decided April 9, 1945 324 U.S. 695 ON PETITION FOR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner Vs. Smith
US Supreme Court
Commissioner
Smith
Feb-26-1945
Land Acquisition
Commissioner v. Smith - 324 U.S. 177 (1945) U.S. Supreme Court Commissioner v. Smith, 324 U.S. 177 (1945) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Smith No. 371 Argued January 30, 31, 1945 Decided February 26, 1945 324...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smith, Kline and French (India) Ltd.
Karnataka
Commissioner of Income-tax
Smith, Kline and French (India) Ltd.
Feb-11-1991
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1) and 40A(7); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 104
1991(1)KarLJ374
K. Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. The question referred to us under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, reads thus : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›