Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. Amalgamations Ltd.
Chennai
Cit
Amalgamations Ltd.
Nov-13-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]127TAXMAN184(Mad)
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.In compliance with the directions of this Court, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has stated the case and referred the following common question of law in relation to the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Amalgamations Ltd.
Chennai
Commissioner of Income Tax
Amalgamations Ltd.
Apr-10-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 and 91
[1998]232ITR608(Mad)
Thanikkachalam, J. 1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following eight questions for the opinion of this Court under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, for the asst. yrs. 1977-78 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Southern Bank Ltd. (Since Amalgamated w ...
Kolkata
Commissioner of Income-tax
Southern Bank Ltd. (Since Amalgamated with United Industrial Bank Ltd.)
Jul-13-1978
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 2(7); ;Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 45(2); ;Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Section 45; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 2(2)
[1979]120ITR92(Cal)
Dipak Kumar Sen, J. 1. The unusual facts which have led up to the present reference are shortly as follows I The Southern Bank Ltd., a banking company, had filed three returns of its income in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Amalgamations Ltd. (No. 1)
Chennai
Commissioner of Income-tax
Amalgamations Ltd. (No. 1)
Jun-26-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28
[2000]245ITR808(Mad)
K.A. Thanikkachalam J.1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following common question for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77 for the opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Amalgamations Ltd. (No. 2)
Chennai
Commissioner of Income-tax
Amalgamations Ltd. (No. 2)
Jul-06-1998
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 261
[2000]245ITR809(Mad)
C. Shivappa, J.1. Heard both learned counsel. We find that the case involves 'no substantial question of law of general importance which needs to be decided by the Supreme Court. Hence, the prayer for the issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Amalgamations Ltd
Chennai
Commissioner of Income-tax
Amalgamations Ltd
Mar-26-1997
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 32 and 37(1)
[1999]236ITR430(Mad)
N. B. Balasubramanian J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Appellate Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following questions of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. Amalgamations Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras
Amalgamations Ltd.
Jul-15-1997
Direct Taxation
(1998)150CTR(SC)96; [1998]232ITR318(SC); (1998)8SCC604
ORDER1. Leave granted. 2. The question raised before the High Court for reference was whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sarabhai Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (Amalgamat ...
Gujarat
Commissioner of Income-tax
Sarabhai Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (Amalgamated with Alkapuri Investment (P) Ltd.)
Feb-25-1992
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80V, 256(2) and 263
[1992]196ITR716(Guj)
G.T. Nanavati, J.1. The Commissioner of Income-tax has filed this application, as the Tribunal has refused to refer to this court the question proposed by him. The question which the Commissioner wanted the Tribunal to refer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Amalgamations Ltd.
Chennai
Commissioner of Income Tax
Amalgamations Ltd.
Nov-08-1994
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 24, 37 and 37(1) and 80(M) and (AA); Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 17(4), 19, 53 and 74
[1995]214ITR399(Mad)
--Oral judgment.Ratio :Oral judgment delivered in court but not signed is valid.Held :A judgment is the final decision of the court intimated to the parties and to the world at large by formal pronouncement or delivery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Amalgamations Ltd.
Chennai
Commissioner of Income-tax
Amalgamations Ltd.
Apr-22-1998
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 22 and 263
(1998)150CTR(Mad)374; [1999]238ITR963(Mad)
N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income tax Appellate Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following two questions of law relating to assessment of income of the assessee for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »