Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: cce · Respondent: telco · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.010 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 10 2001

Cce, Pune Vs. M/S. Telco

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Appellant : Cce, Pune

Respondent : M/S. Telco

Decided on : May-10-2001

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2002)(148)ELT652TriDel

"In view of the fact that hydraulic power pack and coolant unit is itself a machinery, will not make them non-eligible for the benefit of notification No. 281/86 once they satisfy the conditions prescribed in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2001

Cce, Patna, Cce, Pune and M/S Vs. M/S Telco Ltd. and Cce, Allahabad

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Appellant : Cce, Patna, Cce, Pune and M/S

Respondent : M/S Telco Ltd. and Cce, Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-14-2001

Subject : MRTP

1. Both sides submit that the main issue involved in these appeals is the eligibility of certain machinery items manufactured in a factory to exemption under Notification No. 217/86 and that issue remains covered by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Cce Pune Vs. M/S. Telco

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Appellant : Cce Pune

Respondent : M/S. Telco

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2002)(147)ELT1170TriDel

1. Both sides submit that the main issue involved in these appeals is eligibility of certain machinery items such as Roller assembly, Gauges, Push Troylleys, Conveyers etc. manufactured in the factory to exemption under notification No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 05 2003

Cce Vs. Telco

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Cce

Respondent : Telco

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2003(108)LC48(Jharkhand); 2004(165)ELT280(NULL)

ORDER1. The short point involved in this case is with respect to the interpretation of Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 relating to the liability to pay interest on the amount of duty as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial