Advanced Search Results
Cce, Pune Vs. M/S. Telco
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce, Pune
M/S. Telco
May-10-2001
MRTP
(2002)(148)ELT652TriDel
"In view of the fact that hydraulic power pack and coolant unit is itself a machinery, will not make them non-eligible for the benefit of notification No. 281/86 once they satisfy the conditions prescribed in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Patna, Cce, Pune and M/S Vs. M/S Telco Ltd. and Cce, Allahabad
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce, Patna, Cce, Pune and M/S
M/S Telco Ltd. and Cce, Allahabad
Mar-14-2001
MRTP
1. Both sides submit that the main issue involved in these appeals is the eligibility of certain machinery items manufactured in a factory to exemption under Notification No. 217/86 and that issue remains covered by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Pune Vs. M/S. Telco
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce Pune
M/S. Telco
Mar-30-2001
MRTP
(2002)(147)ELT1170TriDel
1. Both sides submit that the main issue involved in these appeals is eligibility of certain machinery items such as Roller assembly, Gauges, Push Troylleys, Conveyers etc. manufactured in the factory to exemption under notification No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cce Vs. Telco
Jharkhand
Cce
Telco
Mar-05-2003
Excise
2003(108)LC48(Jharkhand); 2004(165)ELT280(NULL)
ORDER1. The short point involved in this case is with respect to the interpretation of Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 relating to the liability to pay interest on the amount of duty as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›