Advanced Search Results
Cce Vs. T. Stanes and Company Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Cce
T. Stanes and Company Ltd.
May-22-2008
Service Tax
1. The respondents M/s. T. Stanes & Company Ltd. rendered Clearing and Forwarding Agents' Services to M/s. Indofill Chemicals Ltd. Mumbai. On scrutiny of the records of the respondents it transpired that they had short-paid the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. T
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Cce
T
Jul-09-2003
Service Tax
(2003)(89)ECC448
1. This is a revenue appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 102/2000 (MDU) dt. 26.2.03, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Trichy. The Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the taking of Modvat Credit on the basis of extra copy...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. T.P.S. Mfg. and Construction Co.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce
T.P.S. Mfg. and Construction Co.
Sep-09-2003
Service Tax
(2003)(90)ECC821
1. In this appeal, filed by Revenue, the issue relates to the classification of Body built on motor vehicle chassis.2. Shri Kumar Santosh, learned SDR, submitted that M/s. IPS Mfg. & Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. manufacture...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cce Vs. T. Srinivas and Co.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Cce
T. Srinivas and Co.
Dec-19-2003
Excise
(2004)(114)LC479Tri(Bang.)alore
1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal No. 118/02 (H-III) CE dtd. 31.10.2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad.2. M/s. T. Srinivas & Co., Hyderabad are manufacturer of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. S.T.L. Exports Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce
S.T.L. Exports Ltd.
Mar-24-2004
Excise
(2004)(114)LC803Tri(Delhi)
1. In these two appeals, filed by Revenue, the issue involved is whether Zinc Dross/Ash are leviable to Excise duty.2. Mrs. Charul Baranwal, learned SDR, submitted that the Respondents M/s. STL Exports Ltd, a 100% Export...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. B.T. Steel Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce
B.T. Steel Ltd.
Aug-12-2003
Excise
(2003)(90)ECC323
2. The Department is in appeal against the order of the lower appellate authority allowing Modvat credit to the extent of Rs. 9,42,864 to the respondents. On examination of the records and submissions, we note that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. U.T. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce
U.T. Ltd.
Jan-20-2004
Excise
(2004)(93)ECC82
1. The respondents were engaged in the manufacture of goods falling under Chapters 68, 84 and 87 of the CETA Schedule and availing the Modvat credit facility under Rules 57A and 57Q of the erstwhile Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. T.T.K. Pharma Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Cce
T.T.K. Pharma Ltd.
Jun-12-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(83)ECC38
1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue. The short point to be considered in this case is whether the products i.e. "Wood wards Banalona" manufactured by the appellants are classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 2107.91...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. T.P.S. Ahluwalia, Partner and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Cce
T.P.S. Ahluwalia, Partner and
Dec-19-2005
Service Tax
1. These appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal dated 16.1.2004 wherein the Appellate Authority has set aside the Order-in-Original dated 15.4.2002 which disallowed the Modvat Credit and imposed penalty both on the Appellants and the partner of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Ltu, Chennai Vs. M/S. Areva T and D India Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Cce, Ltu, Chennai
M/S. Areva T and D India Ltd.
May-14-2010
Service Tax
Heard both sides. I find that the lower appellate authority has taken note of the fact that the respondents were not heard before passing the impugned Order-in-Original and hence there has been violation of principles of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›