Advanced Search Results
Brij Pal Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Brij Pal
State of Haryana
Aug-27-2013
Criminal
Crl. Appeal not S-1245-SB o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Appeal not S-1245-SB of 2003 Date of Decision: August 27, 2013. Brij Pal .....Appellant Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Pal vs.the State
Delhi
Brij Pal
The State
Feb-08-2017
Land Acquisition
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.484 /2000 Date of Decision :8. h FEBRUARY, 2017 BRIJ PAL ..... APPELLANT Through Mr.Mir Akhtar Hussain, Adv. versus THE STATE ..... RESPONDENT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Pal Bhargava and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Brij Pal Bhargava and ors.
State of U.P. and ors.
Feb-23-2011
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 5A
1. Leave granted.2. Land owners - appellants have challenged the judgment of Allahabad High Court, challenging the dismissal of their petition, whereby they had challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Constable Brij Pal Singh Vs. the State of Haryana Through Secretary to ...
Punjab and Haryana
Constable Brij Pal Singh
The State of Haryana Through Secretary to Government, Home Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat and
Nov-29-1991
Criminal
Punjab Police Rules, 1938 - Rule 16.24(1) and 16.38; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(1992)101PLR340
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The petitioner, a constable of police, is aggrieved by the order dated June 11, 1988, of the Director General of Police of Haryana, by which his five future increments have been stopped....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Pal Sharma and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Delhi
Brij Pal Sharma and Ors.
The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Jul-03-2015
Land Acquisition
I- 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d July, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2600/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.9283/2015 BRIJ PAL SHARMA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ram Kishan, Advocate versus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.P. Singh @ Brij Pal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand Through C. ...
Jharkhand
B.P. Singh @ Brij Pal Singh and ors.
State of Jharkhand Through C.B.i.
May-07-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 407, 409 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2)
[2003(3)JCR77(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J. 1. Heard. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the Special Judge, C.B.I. could not have taken cognizance of the offences under the provisions of the Indian Penal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Pal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Brij Pal Singh and ors.;sujan Singh and anr.
State of Uttar Pradesh;state of Uttar Pradesh
Feb-18-1987
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 148, 302 Read With 149, 323
1987Supp(1)SCC85
A.P. Sen and; v. Balakrishnan Eradi, JJ.1. These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment and sentences passed by the Allahabad High Court dated February 11, 1982 and confirming those of the Third Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Pal Vs. State
Delhi
Brij Pal
State
Sep-23-1988
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
36(1988)DLT335; 1988(15)DRJ411
D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) This second appeal is by the owner landlady of certain premises in Chawri Bazar, Delhi.(2) The landlady filed a suit for possession against legal representatives of her tenant. Kedar Nath was the tenant....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Pal Vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Supreme Court of India
Brij Pal
State (Delhi Administration)
Feb-01-1996
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 5 and 19
1996IAD(SC)1053; AIR1996SC2915; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)213; 1996CriLJ1677; 1996(1)Crimes93(SC); JT1997(10)SC399; RLW1998(2)SC171; 1996(1)SCALE816; (1996)2SCC676; [1996]1SCR1143
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant Under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (prevention) Act (hereinafter referred to as the TADA Act). By the judgment dated 5.8.94, the learned Judge, Designated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Pal Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Brij Pal Singh and anr.
State of U.P. and ors.
Nov-29-2004
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 3
2005(1)ESC557; [2005(105)FLR75]; (2005)1UPLBEC1022
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties and perused the record.2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners against the award dated 22.10.1991 in Adjudication Case No. 32/90 passed by the Labour Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »