Advanced Search Results
Bhola Nath and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Bhola Nath and ors.
Emperor
Apr-12-1939
Criminal
AIR1939All567
ORDERRachhpal Singh, J.1. These are four connected revision applications arising out of the same judgment and can therefore be conveniently disposed of together. Bola Nath, Bakshi Ram, Salig Ram and Debi Das, applicants, were tried in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Bhola and ors.
Emperor
Jul-18-1924
Criminal
AIR1925All62; 84Ind.Cas.860
Daniels, J.1. The appellants Bhola Singh, Nanhe, Jurri, Sardar, Likha Singh and Ram Sahai have been convicted under Section 402 of the Indian Penal Code of assembling for the purpose of committing dacoity and sentenced to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Bhola
Emperor
Dec-02-1921
Education
AIR1922All86; 65Ind.Cas.438
Stuart, J.1. The Sessions Judge of Agra has referred to this Court the case of a certain Bhola sweeper, who has been bound over by the Cantonment Magistrate of Agra under Section 110, Criminal Procedure Code...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhola Nath Mitter Vs. the Emperor
Kolkata
Bhola Nath Mitter
The Emperor
Jan-03-1924
Criminal
AIR1924Cal616
Panton, J.1. The appellant Bhola Nath Mifcfcer has been convicted by Mr. Rajendra Nath Roy, an Honorary Presidency Magistrate, of offences punishable under Sections 497 and 498, I.P.C. It is found that he enticed or took...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Nath Mitter Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Bhola Nath Mitter
Emperor
Jan-03-1924
Criminal
(1924)ILR51Cal488
Panton, J.1. The appellant, Bhola Nath Mitter, has been convicted by Mr. Rajendra Nath Ray, an Honorary Presidency Magistrate, of offences punishable tinder Sections 497 and 498 of the Penal Code. It is found that he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Sardar Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Bhola Sardar
Emperor
Nov-25-1930
Criminal
AIR1932Cal417
S.K. Ghose, J.1. The two appellants before us have been convicted under Section 373, I.P.C. and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay a fine of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola and ors. Vs. Emperor Through Nihal Taga
Allahabad
Bhola and ors.
Emperor Through Nihal Taga
May-18-1917
Criminal
AIR1917All372; 40Ind.Cas.332
1. This was a case in which eleven persons were jointly tried before a Magistrate of the first class in respect of offences charged under Section 409 and Section 424 of the Indian Penal Code. Three...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Nath Hazra and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Bhola Nath Hazra and ors.
Emperor
Oct-29-1926
Criminal
AIR1927Cal242
Chotzner, J.1. This rule must be made absolute on the first ground upon which it was granted, namely that the trial was bad as not being in conformity with the provisions of Section 276 Criminal Procedure...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Sardar and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Bhola Sardar and ors.
Emperor
Sep-04-1936
Criminal
AIR1937Cal22
1. The six appellants have been convicted of various offences in connexion with an incident which is said to have taken place with regard to the wife of prosecution witness No. 1. Very briefly the prosecution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Nath Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Bhola Nath
Emperor
Jul-12-1928
Criminal
AIR1929All1; 113Ind.Cas.213
Mukerji, J.1. The appellant, Col. Bholanath, has been convicted of the offence of defamation under Section 500, I.P.C. and has been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500. The prosecution was started on two complaints...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›