Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: bhim das · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.008 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 1995

Bhim Das Alias Bhim Chandra Das Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Bhim Das Alias Bhim Chandra Das

Respondent : The State

Decided on : Apr-18-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 164; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 3

Reported in : (1995)2CALLT46(HC)

Arun Kumar Dutta, J.1. This Appeal is directet by the accused-appellant, Bhim Das (hereinafter referred to as accused) against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 15.7.89 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge,,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1995

Bhim Das Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Bhim Das

Respondent : State

Decided on : Apr-18-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154 and 164

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2618

Arun Kumar Dutta, J.1.This Appeal is directed by the accused-appellant, Bhim Das, (hereinafter referred to as accused) against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 15-7-89 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 14th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1951

Bhim Sen for R.S. Malik Mathra Das and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Bhim Sen for R.S. Malik Mathra Das and ors.

Respondent : The State of Punjab

Decided on : Oct-04-1951

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Essential Supplies Act; Amending Act, 1951; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1951SC481; 1952CriLJ75; (1951)IIMLJ641(SC); [1952]1SCR18

Kania, C.J. 1. These are five companion appeals from the judgments of the High Court of East Punjab and the principal point argued before us is as to the legality of the detention of the appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial