Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: beni · Respondent: emperor · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Oct 25 1934

Beni Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Beni

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Oct-25-1934

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1935All214

ORDERBajpai, J.1. This case was heard by me on 6th August 1934, when I directed that, the amin of the Civil Court should be examined and his evidence tested carefully by the execution record of case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 25 1934

Beni Vs. Emperor Through Yasin

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Beni

Respondent : Emperor Through Yasin

Decided on : Oct-25-1934

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 153Ind.Cas.428

Bajpai, J.1. This case was heard by me on August 6, 1934, when I directed that the amin of the Civil Court should be examined and his evidence tested carefully by the execution record of case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 16 1929

Beni Singh Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Beni Singh

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Apr-16-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1929All608; 117Ind.Cas.346

Dalal, J.1. These proceedings must be quashed. On 22nd September 1928 the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of some place not noted issued notice to Beni Singh as follows:you are by habit extortionist and so desperate and dangerous as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Aug 16 1907

Beni Bhushan Roy Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Beni Bhushan Roy

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Aug-16-1907

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1907)ILR34Cal991

Mitra and Fletcher, JJ.1. The petitioner has been bound down under Section 108 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the sum of rupees five thousand, with two sureties each in like sum, to be of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 06 1925

Beni Ram Vs. Emperor Through Hira Lal

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Beni Ram

Respondent : Emperor Through Hira Lal

Decided on : Nov-06-1925

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 92Ind.Cas.694

Sulaiman, J.1. This is an application in revision from a conviction of the accused under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and a sentence of fine. The facts are not now much disputed. The complainant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Aug 28 1918

Beni Madhub Kundu Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Beni Madhub Kundu

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Aug-28-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 46Ind.Cas.849

Lancelot Sanderson, C.J.1. This was a Rule obtained on behalf of Beni Madhub Kundu calling upon the District Magistrate to snow cause why the trial of the petitioner should not be stayed, or why such other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Aug 28 1918

Beni Madhab Kundu Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Beni Madhab Kundu

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Aug-28-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1919)ILR46Cal212

Sanderson, C.J.1. This was a Rule obtained on behalf of Beni Madhab Kundu catling upon the District Magistrate to show cause why the trial of the petitioner should not be stayed, or why such other order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 06 1925

Beni Ram Vs. King-emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Beni Ram

Respondent : King-emperor

Decided on : Nov-06-1925

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1926All237

Sulaiman, J.1. This is an application in revision from a conviction of the accused under Section 500 of the Penal Code and a sentence of fine. The facts are not now much disputed. The complainant has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 03 1918

Beni Madhab Kundu Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Beni Madhab Kundu

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : May-03-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1919)ILR46Cal207

Sanderson, C.J.1. In this mutter the point has been taken by the Jearned vakil for the appellant, that 'the proceedings at the trial were vitiated by the fact that after the Judge's charge was finished--' I...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales