Advanced Search Results

Bankey Lal and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Bankey Lal and ors.

Respondent : State of U.P.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307

Reported in : AIR1971SC2233; 1971CriLJ1540; (1971)3SCC184; 1971(III)LC330(SC)

K.S. Hegde, J.1. 23 persons including the 9 appellants were tried before the Additional Sessions Judge, Badaun for various offences. All of them were convicted by the learned Sessions Judge Under Section 302/149, I.P.C., 307/149 I.P.C,...

Bankey Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Bankey

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376, 509, 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 238

Reported in : AIR1961All131; 1961CriLJ330

V.D. Bhargava, J. 1. Bankey has filed this appeal against his conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511, I. P. C 2. According to the prosecution there was one Chunni resident of Mauza Basoma, police...

Bankey Lal and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Bankey Lal and ors.

Respondent : State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498-A, 323, 506; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3, 4.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.The dispute seems to be between husband and wife. Having gone through the record, I prima facie find that the parties should be given a chance to...

Lal Singh S/O Bankey Lal SimariyA. Vs. State of Uttaranchal.

Court : Uttaranchal

Appellant : Lal Singh S/O Bankey Lal SimariyA.

Respondent : State of Uttaranchal.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 374, 207, 313 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 376 ;

1) This appeal, preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.08.1997, passed by III Addl. Sessions Judge, Nainital, in Sessions...

Bankey Lal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Bankey Lal ;bashi Charan

Respondent : State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.;district Panchayat Raj Adhikari and ors.

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 11B(1), 13B and 14; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1994; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (1997)3UPLBEC1590

R. Dayal, J.1. These special appeals involve common question of law and arise from the judgments of a learned Single Judge whereby writ petitions filed by the appellants to challenge no-confidence proceedings initiated against them as...

Bankey Lal Sharma S/O Todar Mal Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Dev Raj S ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Bankey Lal Sharma S/O Todar Mal Sharma

Respondent : State of U.P. and Dev Raj Singh S/O Nathu Singh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3779

Amar Saran, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate.2. An order dated 27.9.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No. 3, Aligarh in S.T. No. 865 of 2006,...

Ram Adhar Bankey Bihar and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Ram Adhar Bankey Bihar and ors.

Respondent : State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 397 and 401; Evidence Act - Sections 115

Reported in : 1992(0)MPLJ445

ORDERFaizanuddin, J.1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') for setting aside the ex parte order dated 30-1-1991 passed by a Division Bench of...

Bankey Bihari Chauhan Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Bankey Bihari Chauhan

Respondent : State of U.P. and Others

Subject : Education

This special appeal has arisen from a judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 9 December 2014 dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant. The appellant was appointed as a Bus Conductor in the Uttar...