Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: amir · Respondent: emperor · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.013 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 1918

Amir Hasan Khan Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Amir Hasan Khan

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Apr-18-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 46Ind.Cas.150

Piggott, J.1. The learned Sessions Judge of Cawnpore has referred to this Court in revision two orders passed by a Magistrate of the first class subordinate to him in connection with certain prolonged proceedings which have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1925

Amir Ahmad Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Amir Ahmad

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Jul-16-1925

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1926All143

Daniels, J.1. Amir Ahmad Appeals from his conviction under Section 19(f), Arms Act, for possession of cartridges, and Nathu Ram from his conviction under Section 20, Arms Act, on account of possession of a revolver after...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 1916

Amir Hasan Khan Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Amir Hasan Khan

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Dec-22-1916

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1918All266; 38Ind.Cas.736

Tudball, J.1. Mr. Amir Hasan Khan, Government Pleader of Fatehpur, has been convicted of an offence under Section 185 of Act II of 1916 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, and has been fined Rs. 25. This...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 31 1929

Amir Khan and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Amir Khan and ors.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : May-31-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 122Ind.Cas.557

1. In this matter the point that has been taken arises upon the procedure adopted for the constitution of the Jury. The original charge was under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The order-sheet of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1925

Amir Hasan Khan Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Amir Hasan Khan

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Jul-24-1925

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1926All251

Banerji, J.1. This is an application in revision by one Amir Hasan Khan, Sub-Inspector of Police. The charge framed reads as follows: 'That you on or about the 26th day of September 1924 at Police Station...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1948

Amir Singh Vs. Emperor

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Amir Singh

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Apr-01-1948

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1949P& H17

ORDERTeja Singh, J.1. This is a habeas corpus petition by one Amir Singh in respect of L. Ram Saran Das, an advocate of Bhiwani, who was arrested under Section 3, Punjab Public Safety Act, on 5-2-1948....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1916

Bakir Saheb Amir Saheb Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Bakir Saheb Amir Saheb

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Feb-18-1916

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1916Bom218; 34Ind.Cas.969

Batchelor, J.1. The first point taken in this appeal is a question of law which arises in this way;--The appellant, Bakir, has been convicted of making a false charge against one Aliser. The appellant had alleged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1925

Amir Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Amir

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Mar-24-1925

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925All498; 87Ind.Cas.927

Stuart, J.1. I am of opinion that there is considerable force in Mr. Saila Nath Mukerji's argument that no offence has been committed because the empty cartridge oases in question are incapable of being re-loaded in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1945

Amir HossaIn and ors. Vs. King-emperor

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Amir HossaIn and ors.

Respondent : King-emperor

Decided on : Apr-19-1945

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1949CriLJ948

ORDERHenderson, J.1. The petitioners have been convict. ed of an offence punishable under B, 81 (4)/l21, Defence of India Rules for taking certain cattle from the District of Noakhali to the District of Chittagong inspite of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial