Advanced Search Results
Haji Bibi Vs. H.H. Sir Sultan Mahomed Shah, the Aga Khan and ors.
Mumbai
Haji Bibi
H.H. Sir Sultan Mahomed Shah, the Aga Khan and ors.
Sep-01-1908
FamilyCivil
2Ind.Cas.874
Russell, J.1. Although in this suit no less than 128 issues have been raised, and the suit itself has attained the distinction of having taken up the longest time on record in these Courts, the real...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.R. Rajasekharappa Vs. H.N. Siddananjappa
Karnataka
M.R. Rajasekharappa
H.N. Siddananjappa
Jun-05-1990
Family
Hindu Law
ILR1990KAR2303
Held:(i) The legal position is that the joint and undivided family is the normal condition of Hindu Society. An undivided family is not only joint in estate but also in food and worship. The existence of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dependan ...
Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Income-tax;Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dependants and Khanazads Trust;Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bhadur
Aug-04-1978
Direct Taxation
Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 6 and 10(2); Transfer of Property Act; Mohamedan Law; Gift Tax Act - Sections 15(1)
[1983]139ITR517(AP)
Madhava Rao, J. Referred Case No. 59 of 1976 : 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the request of the Commissioner referred the following two questions for decision : '1. Whether, on the facts and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arbaugh Vs. Y and H Corp.
US Supreme Court
Arbaugh
Y and H Corp.
Feb-22-2006
Land Acquisition
Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. - 04-944 (2006) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2005 ARBAUGH V. Y & H CORP. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ARBAUGH v . Y & H CORP. dba THE MOONLIGHT CAFE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHirubhai Himabhai Patel and Others Vs. M/S. V.H. Patel and Co. and Oth ...
Mumbai
Hirubhai Himabhai Patel and Others
M/S. V.H. Patel and Co. and Others
Oct-25-1999
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33
AIR2000Bom114; 2000(2)ALLMR361; 2000(2)BomCR47; (2000)1BOMLR883
ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition challenging the findings on Issue Nos. 8, 13 and 17 recorded by the Sole Arbitrator in his award dated 25th January, 1999 under sections 30 and 33...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. H.H. Rajendrasinghji, Maharaja of Rajpi ...
Mumbai
Commissioner of Income-tax
H.H. Rajendrasinghji, Maharaja of RajpiplA. (by Legal Representative H.H. Raghubirsinghji, Maharaja
Nov-24-1993
Direct Taxation
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 8; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4
[1995]213ITR225(Bom)
Smt. Sujata Manohar J.1. All these reference under the Income-tax Act and under the Estate Duty Act raise a common question relating to a certain property, viz., Rajpipla Palace, left by His Highness Rajendrasinghji, Maharaja of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDady Nowroji Adenwalla and ors. Vs. Burjor H. Antia and ors.
Mumbai
Dady Nowroji Adenwalla and ors.
Burjor H. Antia and ors.
Jun-12-2001
CriminalFamily
(2002)104BOMLR1a
J.A. Patil, J.1. This is a suit for declaration, injunction and possession. The property in respect of which these reliefs are claimed is Flat No. 10 on the 4th Floor of a building known as 'Roxana',...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Karnataka Rep. by Revenue Secretary, Vs. H.B. Munivenkata ...
Karnataka
The State of Karnataka Rep. by Revenue Secretary, ;The Special Deputy Commissioner and the Tahsildar
H.B. Munivenkatappa S/O Late Boyanna (Since Dead by His L.Rs. A. Shakuntala and ors.) Represented by
Mar-08-2007
Property
Karnataka (Personal and Miscellaneous) Inams Abolition Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 9 and 9(1); Land Reforms Act; Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1979; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Land Revenue Code
2007(4)KarLJ439; ILR2007(2)Kar1893; 2007(4)KLJ439; 2007(3)KCCR1959; 2007(3)AIRKarR288
N. Kumar, J.1. This second appeal is preferred by the State of Karnataka and its officials challenging the Judgment and Decree passed by the Lower Appellate Court in R.A. No. 38/2004 wherein it declined to condone...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Sahebzad ...
Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Sahebzadi Anwar Begum Trust
Jul-11-1978
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5(1), 21, 21(1), 21(4); Finance (No. 2) Act, 1971
[1981]129ITR796(AP)
Madhava Rao, J. 1. Referred Case No. 79 of 1976 pertains to the years 1957-58 to 1966-67, while Referred Case No. 121 of 1976 is for the assessment years 1967-68 to 1969-70. Both the cases are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKm. Rohini Singh Vs. Visitor, B.H.U., President of India and Others
Allahabad
Km. Rohini Singh
Visitor, B.H.U., President of India and Others
Oct-23-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 - Sections 18
1999(1)AWC387
O.P. Garg, J.1. The petitioner Km. Rohini Singh appeared in the entrance test for admission to M.Ed. course 1997-98 conducted by Banaras Hindu University (for short 'B.H.U.'). On 8.9.1997 a letter was received by her from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »