Advanced Search Results
All India Non-sc/St Employees
Supreme Court of India
V.K. Agarwal and ors.
Jan-31-2001
Service
(2001)10SCC165
B.N. Kirpal and; Ruma Pal, JJ.1. It appears from all the decisions so far that if as a result of reclassification or readjustment, there are no additional posts which are created and it is a case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Rajah Bommadevara Satyanarayana Varaprasada Rao Bahadur Zemindar G ...
Chennai
Sri Rajah Bommadevara Venkata Bhashyakarlu Rao Bahadur Zamindar Garu, Minor by Mother and Guardian V
Aug-01-1923
Civil
75Ind.Cas.504; (1924)46MLJ117
ORDER1. This is an application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council against an order passed by one of us sitting as a single Judge, under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code and Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Assurance Company Limited by Its Manager Vs. Smt. Padmavatha ...
Karnataka
Smt. Padmavathamma Wife of K.N. Venkataraju, ;smt. K. Rajeswari Wife of K.V. Kamalakar and D.N. Sudh
Nov-19-2009
Motor Vehicles
Constitution of India - Article 142
Anand Byrareddy, J.1. Heard the Counsel for the appellant. The respondents having been served remain unrepresented.2. The appellant is the insurer of a private car involved in an accident. The respondents herein were the legal representatives...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
N. Anilkumar Vs. the Sub Inspector of Police and
Kerala
The Sub Inspector of Police And; V.K. Velu
Jul-08-2010
Constitution
K.M. Joseph 1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the first respondent to provide adequate and effective...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrimetime Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. U.V. Shahadadpuri and Others
Mumbai
U.V. Shahadadpuri and Others
Jun-06-1995
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 and 269UD(1)
(1995)127CTR(Bom)74; [1996]217ITR417(Bom)
ORDER OF PURCHASE--Findings based on facts.Ratio & Held :The decision of the authority proceeds on appreciation of evidence and being a pure finding of fact cannot be disturbed in exercise of writ jurisdiction.Application :Also to current...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGkb Opthalmic Ltd. Vs. V. Acc, Goa and ors.
Mumbai
V. Acc, Goa and ors.
Apr-08-1996
Customs
1996(84)ELT415(Bom)
ORDER1. 1. Learned counsel waives notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent heard forthwith. The petitioner was directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,43,901/- towards the customs duty for the Opthalmic Lenses. The order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBangalore Development Authority Vs. V. Balachandra and Others, Etc.
Supreme Court of India
V. Balachandra and Others, Etc.
Nov-16-1990
Constitution
AIR1991SC964; 1991Supp(2)SCC292
ORDER1. We are told that apart from these cases there are several similar petitions pending in this Court where the Bangalore Development Authority (for short 'BDA') has challenged the Orders of the High Court allowing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons P. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons P. Ltd.
Aug-29-1990
Direct Taxation
[1990]186ITR276(SC); (1996)6SCC294b
K. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. The only question raised in this case is whether the amount advanced by the assesses-employer for construction of houses under 'Subsidised Industrial Scheme' for its employees would be in the nature of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEnglish Electric Co. of India Vs. V. Manohara Rao and ors.
Supreme Court of India
V. Manohara Rao and ors.
Nov-22-2000
Labour and Industrial
Labour Law And Industrial Disputes Act 1947 -- Sections. 2(k), 33, 33-A and 33-C(2)
(2001)ILLJ185SC; (2001)9SCC739
S. Rajendra Babu and; S.N. Variava, JJ.1. The respondents filed a claim petition under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act claiming difference in the wages paid to the permanent workmen and to the respondents. During...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPenugonda Radhakrishnamurthy Vs. V.A.Y. Ethirajulu Chetty and Co. and ...
Chennai
V.A.Y. Ethirajulu Chetty and Co. and ors.
Oct-18-1944
Arbitration
AIR1945Mad184; (1945)1MLJ54
Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Kuppuswami , Ayyar, J., setting aside an order of the Principal Judge of the Gity Civil Court under the provisions of Section 39...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »