Advanced Search Results
Tayal Potteries and Another Vs. Macroplast (P) Ltd.
Allahabad
Sep-09-1998
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9, 21 and 33
1998(3)AWC2200; [2001]103CompCas404(All)
A.K. Banerji, J.1. By means of the abovenoted company petition filed under Sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 (The Act in short), the petitioners M/s. Tayal Potteries through its sole proprietor (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDewan Sugars Ltd. Through Its General Manager (Sugarcane) Vs. Appellat ...
Allahabad
Feb-23-2006
Commercial
2006(3)AWC2320
Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard Sri Vivek Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri S.M.A. Kazmi, learned Additional Advocate General on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 and Sri Yashwant Varma, assisted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Rajendra Singh Vs. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad and O ...
Allahabad
Mar-06-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 14
2000(2)AWC1403; (2000)2UPLBEC1514
M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Vivek Chaudhary for petitioner in the present writ petition as well as Sri R. K. Ojha in connected Writ Petition No. 9580 of 2000 and Sri Pushpendra for U. P. Public...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Maharaja Kumar Kharagh Singh of Nabha (Deceased) T Vs. His Highness Ma ...
Delhi
Jan-16-2014
Land Acquisition
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h January, 2014 % + RFA No.44/2009 MAHARAJA KUMAR KHARAGH SINGH OF NABHA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatan Singh and ors. Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-26-2006
Civil
Uttar Pardesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 82(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(3)
2006(4)AWC3513
ORDERUmeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Surya Shankar Pandey holding brief of Sri Vivek Saran, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This petition challenges the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.K. Dewan and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-23-2004
SICA
Sick Industrial Company Special Provision Act, 1985 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 22 and 22(1); ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 131; Debt Recovery Act - Sections 31
AIR2005All202; 2005(3)AWC2328; 2005(1)ESC581
1. The present writ petition has been filed questioning the legality of the recovery proceeding initiated against the petitioners with a prayer to quash the recovery citations, dated 11.12.2004, issued to the petitioners on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDcm Shriram Industries Ltd., Unit Daurala Sugar Works , Through Its Oc ...
Allahabad
Mar-23-2005
Commercial
Companies Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(4) and 16; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rules 21 and 22; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Order, 1954
2005(3)AWC2513
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri S.P. Gupta Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary Advocate, on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Sudhir Chandra Senior Advocate, assisted by Bharti Sapru Advocate, on behalf of Respondent No. 4,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMenka theater and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-25-2003
Commercial
Uttar Pradesh Entertainments and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 11; Uttar Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 - Sections 3
2003(4)AWC2616
Prakash Krishna, J. 1. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 23.2.1999, passed by respondent No. 1. The petitioner No. 1 is a partnership firm, of which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Limited Formerly Known as Brook Bond Lipton India Limi ...
Allahabad
Jul-06-2007
Labour and Industrial
[2007(115)FLR76]; (2008)ILLJ222All
Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the award dated 27th March, 1997 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Agra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Kumar Vs. Naresh Mehra
Allahabad
Jan-07-2004
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 22; Constitution of India - Article 226
2005(1)ARC267
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, interalia, praying for quashing the order dated 18.11.2003 (Annexure No. 5 to the Writ Petition)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »