Advanced Search Results
A.Badhrachalam Vs. the Principal Secretary
Chennai
Apr-17-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226
Prayer:This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the second respondent in his proceedings Roc.No.26566/2011/A1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.Arumugam Vs. the Chief General Manager State Bank of Mysore and ors.
Chennai
Jun-06-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
1. The writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent dated 22.10.2007, confirming the order of compulsory retirement passed against the petitioner by the second respondent dated 17.7.2007.2.1. The petitioner was serving as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs.Khivraj Housing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Principal Secretary and Commissio ...
Chennai
Apr-25-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to grant permission on petitioner application dated 10.8.2011 for the grant permission to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Narender Kumar Bisani. Vs. the District Collector Kancheepuram Distric ...
Chennai
Apr-24-2012
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to dispose of the representation dated 21.12.2010 and reminder dated 29.2.2012.R.SUDHAKAR, J.ORDER1....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Managing Director Vs. V.Santhiya and ors.
Chennai
Jan-02-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279, 337, 304(A)
Being aggrieved by the award passed in M.C.O.P.Nos.151 of 2006 and 150 of 2006 for the death of R.Vijayakumar and his wife Jagadheeswari, the Transport Corporation has preferred these appeals. 2. On 26.12.2004, deceased Vijayakumar was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. Hemalatha and ors. Vs. S. Nagender,
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-06-1993
CivilMotor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B and 110D
1994(1)ALT553
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. Alleging that the deceased, J. Vijayakumar, aged 34 years, working as Senior Assistant in Coromandal Fertilisers, Hyderabad, who is the husband of the 1st petitioner, father of petitioners 2 and 3 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNorth East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation by Its Managing Direct ...
Karnataka
Dec-20-2005
Motor Vehicles
2006ACJ2553; AIR2006Kant159
K. Sreedhar Rao, J.1. Sri. S.S. Patil Googihal takes notice for the respondent in all the above appeals. All the appeals arise out of the same accident.2. The Petitioners were the inmates of the KSRTC bus....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZeron Electronics (P) Ltd., Vs. State Bank of India Guindy Branch and ...
Chennai
Mar-23-2010
Banking
Punjab Security of Land Tenancy Act, 1953; ;RDDB Act - Sections 19(2) and 25; ;Limitation Act - Section 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 13; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
ORDERT.S. Sivagnanam, J.1. The petitioners, a Private Limited Company, its two Directors and a Guarantor to a loan transaction have filed this Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Munivenkatappa S/O Late Nandiyellappa Vs. the State of Karnataka by ...
Karnataka
Jan-12-2007
Service
Karnataka Civil Services Rules and the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 4, 8, 13 and 214; ;Karnataka City Corporation Employees (Conditions of Services) Rules, 1991 - Rule 2
2007(4)KarLJ216; ILR2007(1)Kar626; 2007(2)KCCR886; 2007(2)AIRKarR304
ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. The petitioner retired from service as an Executive Engineer with the second respondent Corporation, on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.6.2001.2. The petitioner contends that disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Munivenkatappa Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.
Karnataka
Jan-12-2007
Service
Karnataka City Corporation Employees (Conditions of Services) Rules, 1991 - Rules 2 and 4; Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 8, 13 and 214
ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. The petitioner retired from service as an Executive Engineer with the second respondent Corporation, on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.6.2001.2. The petitioner contends that disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »