Advanced Search Results

Emperor Vs. Shaik Hasan Abdul Karim (No. 2)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR566

N.J. Wadia, J.1. The two accused in this case, Shaik Hassan Abdul Karim and Akbarkhan Attamahomed, were tried by Mr. Justice Blagden and a special jury for the murder of a police constable named Nasiruddin on...

The King Emperor Vs. Barendra Kumar Ghose

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1924Cal257

Mookerjee, J.1. This is an application for review of a criminal case on the certificate of the Advocate-General under Clause 26 of the Letters Patent. The petitioner Barendra Kumar Ghose was tried on the 16th and...

Vemavarapur Mallikarjuna Rao Vs. Chaturvedula Siva Sankara Prasad and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 23; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(3)

Reported in : AIR1981AP84

1. This Second Appeal involves the scope and interpretation of Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. 2. The facts of the case relevant for the purpose may be shortly stated. On 10th Apr., 1969,...

King-emperor Vs. Ramanuja Aiyangar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1935)68MLJ1

Horace Owen Compton Beasley, Kt., C.J.1. Before dealing with the first point to be considered by this Full Bench, I propose to set out some of the facts of this case.2. At 1.34 A.M. on the...

Vinnapala Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Rao and ors. Vs. Addanki Narayan ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 3(3), 4 and 23; Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 4; Hindu Womens' Right to Property Act, 1937; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 21

Reported in : AIR2007AP213

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The defendants in O.S. No. 1 of 1989 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Pithapuram, being aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated 19-4-1991 preferred the present appeal. Respondent, the plaintiff in...

Ramachandra Bhimappa Murgod and anr. Vs. Sushila and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3

Reported in : ILR1997KAR40; 1997(1)KarLJ61

M.B. Vishwanath, J.1.This appeal under Section 100 of the C.P.C. has been filed by defendants-1 and 2 against plaintiffs-2 to 4. Plaintiff-1 is since deceased.2. The first plaintiff is the mother. Plaintiffs-2 to 4 are the...

M.N. Venkateshaiah Vs. G.N. Krishnappa

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Mysore Hindu Law Women's Rights Act, 1933 - Sections 8(1); Hindu Women's Right To Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(3)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR313

K.A. Swami, J. 1. R.F.A. 197/1982 is preferred against the Judgment and decree dated 19-4-1982 passed by the learned XI Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore in O.S. No. 436/1976 (Old) O.S. No. 1176/1980 (new). R.F.A. 198/1982...

Khalaksingh Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154, 255, 271, 297, 367 and 540; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96

Reported in : AIR1957MP153; 1957CriLJ1138

A.H. Khan J.1. Khalaksingh son of Budheram was tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, and Khalaksingh's son, Mangaram was tried for the offence under Section 302 read...

Afsar Mian Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 1974CriLJ834; ILR1973Delhi68; 1973RLR515

Safeer, J.(1) The appellant has come up against his conviction under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, hereafter called 'the Code' on accnt of which he was sentenced to 4 years rigorous imprisonment by Shri...

Sivakami Vs. Thangavel

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Hindu Succession Act - Sections 23

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ608

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Sivakami, the second plaintiff in the suit, is the appellant herein. 2.The appellant along with her mother, Lakshmi Ammal filed the suit for partition of 4/6 share in the suit property and also...