Advanced Search Results
Mohd. Anis and ors. Vs. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-24-2003
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168; Workmen's Compensation Act
2005ACJ1935; AIR2003MP276
Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahdol, Claim Case No. 27/92, dated 29-3-1996.2. Briefly, claimants are legal heirs, of driver Mohd. Safi (deceased). They are claiming...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalmukund Arora (Since Deceased) Through Om Prakash Vs. State of Rajas ...
Rajasthan
Sep-15-2004
ConstitutionCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 22, Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2005Raj228; RLW2005(1)Raj221; 2005(1)WLC73
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This restoration application has been filed by the petitioner-applicant Om Prakash, who is son of Ram Chandra, in capacity as LR of deceased Balmukund on 29.6.2004 with the prayer the writ petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Sarup Singh (Deceased) Vs. Rajeshwar Sarup and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-30-1996
FamilyProperty
Hindu Succession Act - Sections 63; Evidence Act - Sections 68; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27
(1997)115PLR336
N.K. Kapoor, J.1. Plaintiff feeling dissatisfied with the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court have filed this regular second appeal.2. Plaintiffs filed a suit for separate possession by partition of the property as detailed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hindustan Pencils (P) Ltd. Vs. India Stationery Products Co. and anr.
Delhi
Jan-23-1989
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
AIR1990Delhi19; 1989(2)ARBLR72(Delhi); 38(1989)DLT54
B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) The plaintiffs have filed a suit for perpetual injunction alleging infringement of their registered trade mark and have also prayed for a decree for rendition of accounts of profits against the defendants....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRewachand and anr. Vs. Anandsingh Kachhawaha and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-28-1964
Constitution
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 116A(2) and 116A(5); Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 247E and 247H; Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 329; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 46
AIR1965Raj58
Modi, J. 1. This is an appeal by Shri Rewachand and Shri Keshavsingh, election petitioners, under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (Act No. 43 of 1951, hereinafter called the Act) against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Sanjay Anandrao Powar, Tal- Gadhinglaj, Dist- Kolhapur Vs. Mr. Pra ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Mar-31-2009
MRTP
Oral Order:- Per Justice Mr. B.B. Vagyani, Honble President: We heard Adv.Shri Anand Patwardhan for appellant and Adv.Shri Santosh Jagtap for the respondent. The issue involved in the consumer complaint is of medical negligence. The appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Villayati Ram Mittal Builders, Office at Keshav Kunj, Navi Mumbai ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Aug-21-2009
Land Acquisition
Per Mr. S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member: 1. These appeals arises out of one and the same order/award and hence stands disposed of by this common order. 2. Shri Rajesh Darshanlal Bindra/org.complainant filed consumer complaint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExecutive Engineer (Urban) Maharashtra State Electricity, Solapur and ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Apr-21-2009
MRTP
Per Justice Mr. B.B. Vagyani, Honble President: This appeal filed by org.opp.party in consumer complaint no. 112/2006 is directed against the order dated 12/05/2007 passed by District Consumer Forum, Solapur. The District Forum cancelled the electricity...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Company Ltd., Fort, Mumbai Vs. Santoshkumar Kejriwa ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Apr-02-2009
Land Acquisition
Oral Order :- Per Justice Mr.B.B.Vagyani, Honble President: We heard Adv.Shri A.S.Vidyarthi for appellant and Adv.Shri Anand Kumar for the respondent. Matter pertains to the mediclaim policy. The insurance company repudiated the claim mainly on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Premji Dana Jogadia Vs. Shri Shridhar J. Amberkar
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Oct-09-2009
Land Acquisition
Oral Order:- Per Mr. S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member: This appeal filed by the org. complainant/Shri Premiji Dana Jogadia being not satisfied with the impugned order dated 21/01/2009 passed in consumer complaint no.03/2002 by District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »