Advanced Search Results
Smt. Anju Nigam vs.union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Jul-31-2018
Land Acquisition
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2464/2000 Reserved on :18. h May, 2018 Date of decision:31. t July, 2018 SMT. ANJU NIGAM ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Jyoti...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Gopika Chandrabhushan Saran and anr. Vs. Xlo India Ltd. and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-29-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630 and 630(1)
[2009]148CompCas122(Bom)
V.C. Daga, J.1. Heard.2. Perused record.3. The present revision application arises from the complaint made by respondent No. 1-M/s. XLO India Ltd., Mumbai, against the applicants-accused under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAkash JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev.),
Authority for Advance Rulings
Aug-29-2006
Land Acquisition
(2007)(207)ELT291AAR
Respondent: Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), Amritsar and Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), Lucknow Syed Shah Mohammad Quadri, Chairman, Somnath Pal and B.A. Agrawal, Members For Respondents/Defendant: A.K. Roy, Joint CDR, New Delhi, Sanjay Saran, Addl. Commissioner, Amritsar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gopika Chandrabhushan Saran and anr. Vs. Xlo India Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-2009
Criminal
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630, 630(1), 538 and 545; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
AIR2009SC2032; [2009]148CompCas130(SC); JT2009(3)SC431; 2009(3)SCALE225; (2009)3SCC342; [2009]90SCL281(SC)
Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. Leave Granted.2. The issue that arises for our consideration in the present appeal is with regard to the scope of and ambit of the provisions of Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›