Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Advocate: r a singh · Page 1 of about 3,323 results (0.408 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2005

Madhya Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation Limited, a Fully Sta ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-2005

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91, 92, 92(1), 92(2), 92(3), 94 and 94(4); Limitation Act, 1963; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 77F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 3(5)

Reported in : AIR2005Bom318; 2005(4)ALLMR281

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. These cross petitions challenging the order of Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court at Mumbai in Revision Application No.194 of 2003 passed on 28.9.2004 whereby the challenge to the order passed by the Co-operative...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2005

Committee of Management, Adarsh Inter College Through Its Manager, Jit ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-2005

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesElection

Acts : Intermediate Education Act; Intermediate Education Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2650; [2005]2ITR1113(All)

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri R.N. Singh on behalf of the Committee of Management, Sri R.C. Singh on behalf of respondent No. 5 and Standing Counsel on behalf of other respondents.2. Adarsh Inter College, Handia Mittoopur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1999

Dev Shankar and Karmendra Singh Vs. Nagar Nigam and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-21-1999

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1999)3UPLBEC2410

A.A. Desai and D.R. Chaudhary, JJ.1. Instant is the application filed by the applicant (respondent No. 3), hereinafter referred to as the applicant with the prayer to recall the ex parte order dated 20-7-1999 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 17 1990

Jitendra Nath Singh and anr. Vs. Alok Ranjan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-17-1990

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 51A and 484

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1183

ORDERRavi S. Dhavan, J.1. Present : Mr. Alok Ranjan, I.A.S.Mr. M. P. Aneja, Town Planner,Mr. P. P. Dwivedi, Superintendent Government Garden,Mr. C. B. Tripathi, Dy. Director, Sports,Mr. K. K. Chaturvedi, Sports Officer,Mr. U. N. Sharma, Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2012

P.K. Udgata and Others Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and An ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. By this common order, we propose to dispose the OAs No. 1563/2011, 1564/2011, 1565/2011 and OA 2116/2011, as they involve identical issues of facts and law. The applicants are represented by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2005

Rama Kant Misra Son of Hira Mani Misra Vs. Committee of Management, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 2(1); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulation 6; Uttar Pradesh High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 - Sections10, 10(1), 10(2), 11;, 12, 12A,12B, 12C,13 14,15, 15(1) and 15A; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Services Commission Rules, 1983 - Rules 4 to 9, 10, 11, 12 and 14; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(5) and 3(7);

Reported in : 2005(4)ESC2517

V.K. Shuklal, J.1. Brief facts giving rise to instant writ petition in brief is that in the district of Allahabad there is a recognised institution known as Badri Nath Tiwari Inter College, Meja Road, Allahabad. Said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2001

Pressure Sensitive System (India) Ltd. Vs. Aristocraft International P ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 299

Reported in : AIR2001MP135; 2001(5)MPHT130; 2001(3)MPLJ520

Arun Mishra, J.1. Present Letters Patent Appeals - L.P.A. No. 118/2000, L.P.A. No. 124/2000 and L.P.A. No. 127/2000 have been respectively preferred by M/s. Pressure Sensitive System (India) Limited, Union of India and M/s. Aristrocraft International...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2002

Manohar Singh Marwaha Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP136

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. The petitioners, owners of Dairy farms in the Gwarighat area of Jabalpur have called in question the validity of the notification dt. 19-3-1999 issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur in excercise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2012

K. Kannan, Peon Mts New Delhi and Others Vs. the Chairperson, National ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-10-2012

Subject : Education

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A): 1. Six applicants (two LDCs and four Peons) working from July, 2008 on ad hoc basis in the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) whose temporary service has not been extended,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1999

Committee of Management, Jagdish Saran Rajvanshi Kanya Inter College M ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-23-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 11, 11(5) ; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulation 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC744; (2000)2UPLBEC1161

R.R.K. Trivedi and M. C. Jain, JJ. 1. As in both the aforesaid special appeals, the controversy involved is similar, they can be disposed of by a common order against which learned counsel for the parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial