Advanced Search Results

Harish Arora Vs. District Magistrate, Shahdol and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 107, 144, 144(4), 144(5), 144(6) and 145; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT24; 2001(2)MPLJ197

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court the petitioner has prayed for issue of writ of Certiorari for quashment of orders contained in Annexures P-13 to P-17.2. The facts as have been unfolded...

Sandeep Kumar Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through the Chief Secreta ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

By Dr. Veena Chhotray: 1. The applicant is challenging his non-selection to the post of Warder in the Office of the Director General (Prisons) under the GNCTD, on the basis of a selection process undertaken during...

Poonamchand JaIn Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 23, 24(8) and 301(2)

Reported in : II(2001)DMC499; 2001(2)MPLJ61

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of writ of certiorari for quashment of order passed...

Poonamchand JaIn Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 24, 24(8), 301(2) and 439; Maharashtra Law Officer (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 - Rule 22; Madhya Pradesh Zila Yojna Samiti Adhiniyam, 1995

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT579

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of writ of certiorari for quashment of order passed...

Leela Shanker Vs. Bhagwandas and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498

Reported in : I(1992)DMC165

R.D. Shukla, J.1. This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 14.8.1985 of the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal passed in Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 1983 arising out of the judgment and...

Shahdol Pipe Works and anr. Vs. Zila Laghu Udyog Kamgar Sangh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCivil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 18

Reported in : (2005)IILLJ355MP; 2004(4)MPHT80; 2004(4)MPLJ474

S.K. Pande, J.1. These appeals under Section 96, CPC are directed against the judgment-decree dated 17-8-94, passed by I ADJ, Shahdol in C.S. No. 11-A/89.2. Plaintiff Shahdol Pipe Works is a registered partnership firm engaged in...

Shyama Bai Widow of Late Mulayam Chand JaIn Vs. Murlidhar S/O Late Dr. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2008(4)MPHT123

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. The land lady, being dissatisfied by the impugned order dated 19/6/2003 passed by Rent Controlling Authority, Shahdol in case No. 3/A 90/92-93 dismissing her application of eviction against the respondent, has filed this...

J.K. Dhir Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970 - Rules 2.2, 2.2(6), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 17; Punjab Service of Engineers Class I P. W. D. (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1964; Punjab Government Allocation of Business Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 4 and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 154, 154(1), 163, 166, 166(2), 166(3), 166(5), 245, 309, 311(1), 356, 356(1) and 509; Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850; Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952; Business of the Government of Punjab Rules, 1983 - Rules 4, 6, 6(2) and 13; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68 C, 68-D, 68-D(2) and 68-D(3); Business of the Government of Punjab (Amendment) Rules, 1985 - Rules 4, 8, 18, 28 and 28(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 49(1); Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sec

Reported in : AIR1988P& H1

D.S. Tewatta, J.1. Petitioner Shri J. K. Dhir, who at the relevant time happened to be Superintending Engineer, Sutlej Yamuna Link Canal Project (for short 'SYL Canal Project'), petitioner Shri A. K. Ummat, who at the...

Gend Lal Vs. Mohammad Habeeb (Dead) Th:lrs, Must Makbaalan Bi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

W.P.No.13192 o”23. 08.2012 Shri P.N.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.He is heard on the question of admission. It is directed that on payment of PF alongwith requisites of registered post within three working days notice against...

Dinesh Dixit Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

1 W.P.No.21862/2011 19/07/2013 Shri P.N.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. Petitioner, a legal practitioner, seeks quashment of communication dated 20.10.2009, order dated 11.11.2010 and the agreement dated 29.12.2010 between the respondent No.2 and 3. Vide...