Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Advocate: manoj kumar · Page 1 of about 8,556 results (0.693 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 26 2012

Dr. P. Suresh Babu Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secretary to ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Sep-26-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The applicant, a Deputy Collector, had requested the Government of Kerala to count his previous service in the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC) for calculating the qualifying service for promotion to the Indian Administrative Service...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2008

Manoj Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-08-2008

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Mridula Mishra, J.1. Both these writ applications arise out of order dated 16.3.2007 passed by the Chairman, State Transport tribunal in Transport Revision No. 37 of 2006 and 39 of 2006.2. Prayer of the petitioners in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1992

Mohammed Saleem Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-07-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)226

Y.R. Meena, J.1. This Miscellaneous Petition is directed against the order of the. learned Judicial Magistrate, No. 2, Jodhpur, whereby, he ordered that vehicle No. RJ-19G 0755 be released on 'Supurdginama' to Manoj Kumar (respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 27 2002

Mosomat Ful Sunder Ojha with Manoj Kumar Ojha Vs. State and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-27-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438

P.K. Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This petition is being disposed of along with Cr. Misc. No. 5305 of 2002 and this order will govern both the cases.3. In this instant case, mother-in-law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2002

Chandra Bihari Gautam and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 141, 148, 149, 302, 304 and 436 ;Arms Act - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2002SC1836; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)4; 2002(2)BLJR1098; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN60; 2002CriLJ2541; 2002(2)Crimes222(SC); JT2002(4)SC62; 2002(3)SCALE554; (2002)9SCC208; [2002]2SCR1164

Sethi, J.1. Contending that the prosecution had failed to prove the presence of all the appellants and the existence of common objection within the meaning of Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, the learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2010

R. Vasudevan Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-14-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 8, 12, 13(1) and 13(2); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act - Sections 6A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 437(1) and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT583

V.K. Shali, J.1. This is a bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under Section 120B IPC and Section 7, 8, 12, 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1999

Baby Devi and ors. Vs. Arun Kumar Aman Alias Rameshwar Rahi Alias Rame ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-23-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125, 125(1) and 313

Sudhir Kumar Katriar, J.1. This criminal revision application is directed against the judgment dated 18-10-93, passed by Shri Vijay Kant Misrira, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Munger, in Maintenance Case No. 17/90 (Baby Devi v. Arun Kumar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2005

Ge Motors India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mukesh Kumar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-2005

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 11 and 12; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Constitution of India - Article 215; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 3

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT191; 2006(32)PTC768(Del)

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. This is a petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India wherein the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2026

Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs Sanjeev Malhotra & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-08-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 591/2023, CM APPL. 42578/2023 & CM APPL. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mukesh Gupta, SC for MCD,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2010

K.K. Remani, Additional Secretary to Government Home Department, Gover ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : May-17-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

The Original Applications No. 118/10 and No. 184/10 were heard together as the main and common prayer of the applicants therein is for their inclusion in the select list for filling up two vacancies for appointment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial