Advanced Search Results
Nikhil Saxena vs.state (n.c.t of Delhi)
Delhi
Dec-09-2019
Criminal
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1244/2018 NIKHIL SAXENA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jai Khanduja, Advocate. versus STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Punjab State Through Executive Engineer, Kharar Construction Divis ...
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-08-1993
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 20 and 30; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 2; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3(3) and 4
(1993)105PLR1
ORDERA.P. Chowdhri, J. 1. This Judgment would dispose of these appeals which arise in identical circumstances and raise common question of fact and law. 2. FAO No. 1122 of 1991 is directed against order and decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›