Advanced Search Results

M.M.T.C. of India Vs. Ocean Knigh Maritime Co Ltd. and

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5,11 and 12; Constitution Of India - Article 137

R.M . LODHA, J . 1. The present appeal by special leave arises from the order dated February 4, 2005 passed by the Delhi High Court whereby the Single Judge of that court allowed the petition filed...

Dr. D.K. Verma Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Recruitment and Promotion

Acts : The Recruitment and Promotion Rule

1. The petition has been filed on the following prayers vide para 7(i) and (ii): “7 (i) That the notification dated 19.9.2003 may be declared legal and valid and the applicant may be held as Principal...

Amrish Rana Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; ;Prisoners Act, 1894 - Section 13

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2991

ORDERKuldip Chand Sood, J.1. How course of justice could be derailed, if not thwarted, by an undertrial prisoner with the help or connivance of Jail Officials/Doctors is the focal point, which stares at us calling for...

intercare Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2001)(128)ELT203TriDel

1. The authorities below have denied the benefit of exemption from duty in terms of SI. No. 9 of the Table annexed to Notification No.13/95-Cus. "Agglutinating Sera" imported by the appellants herein on the ground that...

Collr. of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Citric India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(74)ECC254

1. This appeal, filed by the Revenue, is against the order of the Collector of Central Excise dropping demand of Central Excise duty on Innoculum Media and Calcium Citrate as raised by the Department in show-cause...

Jaypee Bela Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(128)ELT225TriDel

1. This appeal arises out of and is directed against the order in appeal dated 14-3-2000 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bhopal.2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of cement falling under...

Malviya Chem. and Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(127)ELT274TriDel

1. The brief facts of this case are that the appellants manufacture Paracetamol, a bulk drug falling under Chapter Heading 2942 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They are also availing Modvat credit of duty...

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Shri Bijendra Kumar Das and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

R.S. Garg, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the employee was removed from service in the year 1994 in undivided Bihar and the reference was made later on...

Prahlad Dal Mill and ors. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 3(1) and 6; Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar (Amendment) Act, 1981; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 39(2) and 50; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 15

Reported in : [1990]79STC62(MP)

K.M. Agarwal, J. 1. This order shall also dispose of Misc. Petition No.1508 of 1981, Sudhamalal Darshanlal and eight others v. State of M.P. and another and Misc. Petition No. 47 of 1982, Rampal Ramgopal and...

Ram Nath Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR173(Jhr)]

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by petitioner for a direction on the respondents to reconsider the case of petitioner for promotion to the post of Deputy Commandant, in view of the fact...