Advanced Search Results
Commissioner, Trade Tax Vs. Rathi Ispat Ltd.
Allahabad
May-05-2003
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4B(2) and 4B(5); Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 25B(1)
[2004]138STC470(All)
Prakash Krishna, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated August 18, 1995 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Bench II, Ghaziabad, in Second Appeal No. 29 of 1995 for the assessment year 1987-88.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar Through Cbi
Patna
Apr-02-2009
Criminal
Representation of People Act, 1951 - Section 8(4); ;Evidence Act - Section 10; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 389, 389(1), 389(2), 389(3) and 389(4); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; ;Constitution of India - Article 14
2009(57)BLJR2550
ORDERI.A. No. 471 of 20091. The appellant Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav has filed the present interlocutory application under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying therein to suspend/stay the order of conviction dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala, represented by The District Collector Vs. Thomas and ...
Kerala
Dec-14-2015
Land Acquisition
Anil K. Narendran, J. 1. These Land Acquisition Appeals arise out of a Section 4(1) notification dated 18.7.2009 published under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the doubling work of Chengannur-Chingavanam Railway track. Since identical issues...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Saraya Industries Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-06-2005
Excise
Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 3(11), 3(22), 11, 12(1), 13, 17, 18, 24, 24A, 24B, 28, 29, 31 and 77; Uttar Pradesh Excise (Amendment) Act, 1950; Indian Tariff Act, 1894; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Constitution of India - Article 47
2005(1)AWC911
V.M. Sahai, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in these petitions is whether excise duty could be levied against the petitioners if the security holograms which were to be affixed by the distilleries on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunita Devi and Vijya Laxmi Devi Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jharkhand
Jun-22-2007
Commercial
I(2008)BC492; [2007(4)JCR362(Jhr)]
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In both the writ petitions, a common prayer has been made for quashing the 'Notice Inviting Tender' (NIT for short) dated 1.5.2007, whereby tender has been invited for allotment of STD/ISD/PCO/Fax/Internet Booth...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarkwell Paper Plast Pvt. Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax
Allahabad
Apr-16-2003
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4A and 4A(3)
[2004]138STC616(All)
Prakash Krishna, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated July 3, 2002 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, U.P., Lucknow, in Appeal No. 111 of 2001. The appeal before the Tribunal was filed against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRathi Super Steel Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax
Allahabad
May-07-2003
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4A and 10
[2004]138STC646(All)
Prakash Krishna, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated February 19, 2003 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, in Appeal No. 133 of 2002. The short controversy involved in the present revision is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnant Ram Prem Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-04-2003
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 10, 10(6), 10(8), 10(11), 21, 21(2) and 254; ;Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 68; ;Trade Tax Tribunal Regulations, 1988 - Regulation 11
[2006]143STC542(All)
Prakash Krishna, J. 1. This writ petition is against the order dated May 26, 2003 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Meerut. The petitioner has sought quashing of the aforesaid order dated May 26, 2003 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPanchi Petha Store Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Allahabad
May-02-2003
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 10B and 21
[2006]143STC325(All)
Prakash Krishna, J.1. The sole question involved in the present case is whether the Deputy Commissioner in exercise of powers under Section 10-B of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 can revise the assessment order on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Shankar Kumar and ors. Vs. State Bank of India and ors.
Patna
Jul-26-2001
Labour and Industrial
1. Both the appeals have been filed against the same order, dated April 3, 2001, passed by a learned single Judge and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »