Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Advocate: ashok panda · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.072 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 2002

Simanchal Panda Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2002SC2444; [2002(2)JCR10(SC)]; JT2002(2)SC17; 2002LabIC2331; 2002(1)SCALE438; (2002)2SCC669; 2002(2)SCT105(SC); (2002)2UPLBEC1147

The appellant herein, who lost before the High Court fighting his cause as fourth-respondent in a Writ Petition filed in the High Court by the fourth- respondent in this appeal, has challenged the judgment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1983

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 39, 41, 42, 226 and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XXVI - Order XLVI, Rules 6, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act; Inter-State Migrant Workmen Rules; Mines Rules, 1955 - Rules 30 to 32; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 2(1), 4, 8, 12 and 21; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1980 - Rules 22 to 45; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 10 to 15; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Evidence Act; Contract Labour Act - Sections 2(1), 16, 17, 18 and 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC); 1983 (3) SCC 161

Bhagwati, J.1. The petitioner is an organisation dedicated to the cause of release of bonded labourers in the country. The system of bonded labour has been prevalent in various parts of the country since long prior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2023

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-23-2023

Subject : Right to Information

1 2023 INSC1086Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No 443 of 2017 Public Interest Committee for Scheduling Specific Areas and Anr ... Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 13 1999

Ramji Rai and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-13-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 302, 302/149, 307/149, 323, 324, 326, 380 and 452; Arms Act - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 366

Reported in : AIR1999SC3857; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)884; 2000CriLJ19; 1999(4)Crimes308(SC); JT1999(8)SC236; 1999(6)SCALE565; (1999)8SCC389

ORDERSantosh Hegde, J.1. The Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari, East Champaran District, State of Bihar by his Judgment dated 28th of July, 1992 delivered in Sessions Trial No. 180/29 of 1991 convicted 21 persons, for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Commnr. of Central Excise, Chennai Vs. M/S. Grasim Industries

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2015

Subject : Excise

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8359 OF2003Commnr. Of Central Excise, Chennai-III Appellant(s) VERSUS Grasim Industries Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.The issue involved in the present case pertains to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2009

Dcm Limited Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 45(1)

Reported in : 2009(3)SCALE717; (2009)4SCC321; [2009]19STT399; (2009)21VST417(SC):2009AIRSCW2281

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Leave granted.2. A short question which arises in this batch of civil appeals is : whether the taking of the delivery of chemicals in Delhi by the purchasing dealers, in the context of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2014

S.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2014

Subject : FERA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 340 of 2008 Reserved on: May 21, 2014 Decision on: May 29, 2014 S.K. JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1997

Bibhachha Alias Bibachha Baitharu Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-09-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 46 and 302

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1553

P.K. Mohanty, J.1. This is an appeal by the convict in a case under Section 302 IPC sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment.2. Prosecution case, bereft of unnecessary details is that on 16-11-1989 at about 8...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2006

Arvinder Singh Bains Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) (Class I) Rules, 1976 - Rules 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 to 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 21C, 24(5), 25; Medical Services Rules, 1945 - Rule 18; Service Regulations - Regulation 3; Recruitment Regulations - Regulations 30, 34 and 34(6)

Reported in : AIR2006SC2265; 2006(6)SCALE339; (2006)6SCC673; 2006(3)SLJ489(SC); 2006(2)LC843(SC)

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 - Khushi Ram and Gurpal Singh Bhatti are impleaded as parties in I.A. No. 3 as per order dated 18.05.2006.2. The appellant - Arvinder Singh Bains filed the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1985

Peoples Union for Democraticrights and anr. Vs. Ministry of Home Affai ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-1985

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1985Delhi268; ILR1987Delhi235

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.(1) Following English American decisions, our Supreme Court has, of late admitted exceptions from the strict rules relating to locus; standi and the like in the case of a class of litigations which have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial