Advanced Search Results
State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Komal Prasad Pandey
Chhattisgarh
Aug-07-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 4 and 25(1B); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 354(3) and 366
2004(1)MPHT62(CG)
L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. Accused/appellant Komal Prasad Pandcy was tried by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Mungeli, District Bilaspur in Sessions Trial Nos. 326/99, 330/99 and 331/99 for the commission of the offences punishable under Section 302...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilbodh Nagesia Vs. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)
Chhattisgarh
Jul-28-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 8
2004CriLJ2347; 2004(1)MPHT26(CG)
L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. These two appeals, i. e., Criminal Appeal No. 454/2000 preferred by Dilbodh Nagesia and Criminal Appeal No. 1271/2000 preferred by Tijan Nagesia are arising out of the same judgment therefore they are being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPreeti Gupta vs M/S Emkay Traders
Delhi
Mar-09-2026
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 27th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 9th March, 2026 + RC.REV. 297/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusM/S BIKRAM TRADERS .....Respondent Through: Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Preeti Gupta vs Prakash Chand Periwal
Delhi
Mar-09-2026
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 27th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 9th March, 2026 + RC.REV. 297/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusM/S BIKRAM TRADERS .....Respondent Through: Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPreeti Gupta vs M/S Bikram Traders
Delhi
Mar-09-2026
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 27th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 9th March, 2026 + RC.REV. 297/2023 PREETI GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusM/S BIKRAM TRADERS .....Respondent Through: Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBishwanath Sahani, Vs. State of Bihar
Patna
Dec-13-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 394 and 412; Arms Act - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
Ghanshyam Prasad and Shyam Kishore Sharma, JJ.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 30th May, 2003 and order of sentence dated 2.6.2003 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuman Kaushik Vs. N.P.Kaushik
Delhi
Jan-14-2013
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.92/2009 % Date of Decision: January 14, 2013 SUMAN KAUSHIK ..... Appellant Through : Mr.S.Rajappa, Advocate along with appellant in person versus N.P.KAUSHIK ..... Respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShailender Singh & Anr. Vs.state Delhi Admn.
Delhi
Oct-01-2018
Criminal
$~34 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. APPEAL No.140/2002 Decided on:-"1st October, 2018 SHAILENDER SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar & Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advs. versus STATE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Sanjeet Kumar vs Sh. Ashok Kumar Verma & Ors.
Delhi
May-18-2026
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 18.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 365/2025 SH. SANJEET KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Rahul Khan, Advocates.versusSH. ASHOK KUMAR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarbjyot Kaur Saluja and ors. Vs. Rajender Singh Saluja
Delhi
Nov-20-2007
Family
Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18, 20 and 23; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rules 15 and 17 - Order 33, Rules 1, 2 and 5
148(2008)DLT650
Anil Kumar, J. IA No. 3544/20071. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff/applicant states that another application under Order 6 Rule 17 has also been filed by the plaintiff and consequently she does not press the present...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »