Advanced Search Results
Arjun Singh and anr. Vs. Assistant Director of Income-tax (investigati ...
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-23-1998
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1), 132, 132(1), 143(3), 144A, 147, 148, 148(2), 151 and 282; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16(3), 17 and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 11, 12, 13(1) and 13(2)
[2000]246ITR363(MP)
D. P. S. Chauhan, J.1. Threatened with the invasion of their rights, the petitioners, in these two writ petitions, numbered 2593 of 1997 and 1723 of 1998, approached this court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-18-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 302 and 304
AIR2002SC2721; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)267; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)198; (SCSuppl)2002(3)CHN162; 2002CriLJ3551; 2002(3)Crimes21(SC); JT2002(5)SC438; 2002(5)SCALE283; (2002)6SCC384; [2002]SUP
Y.K. Sabharwal, J. 1. In these appeals Arjun Singh, Rakesh, Mahesh, Rajbir and Sarjan Singh are the appellants. They have been convicted by the impugned judgment of the High Court for offences under Sections 147 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsman Investment Ltd. Vs. K.L. Suneja and anr.
Delhi
Mar-03-1998
ContractCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIII, Rule 2
1998IIIAD(Delhi)578; AIR1998Delhi204; 72(1998)DLT286; 1998(44)DRJ791; (1998)119PLR7; 1998RLR297
D.K. Jain, J. 1. This order will dispose of plaintiff's application under Order 13 Rule 2, read with section 151, CPC, seeking leave of the Court to file copies of the Resolution dated 27th June, 1989...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Laxmi Devi (Mst.) Vs. the Civil Judge (Senior Division) and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-23-2008
Limitation
RLW2008(3)Raj2015
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The plaintiff/petitioners have preferred this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 23.1.2004, whereby the trial Court rejected their applications under Order 22 Rule 3, C.P.C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur Vs. Pista and Other ...
Rajasthan
Mar-29-2001
Motor Vehicles
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173
II(2002)ACC568; 2003ACJ1783; 2002(1)WLC756; 2002(1)WLN266
ORDERPanwar, J.(1). This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 24th of March 1994 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sojat, (hereinafter referred as 'the Tribunal' in short) in M.A.C.T. case No. 165/92...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjun Singh Bhim Singh Yadav Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
May-09-1998
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
1998(2)MPLJ486
Rajeev Gupta, J.1. Appellant Arjun Singh has preferred this appeal against his conviction Under Section 302, of the Indian Penal Code (for Short the IPC), and sentence of imprisonment for life, recorded by IIIrd Additional Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTammina Ananda Kumar Vs. Syndicate Bank Staff Co-operative Buildings S ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-09-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
AIR2003AP287; 2003(2)ALD297; 2003(6)ALT814
Goda Raghuram, J.1. CMP No. 1 1805/2002 in CMP No. 24385/2001 in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was filed by the respondent in the Appeal to vacate the interim order dated 21-12-2001 passed in CMP No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjun Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
May-09-1998
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
1998CriLJ3956
Rajeev Gupta, J.1. Appellant Arjun Singh has preferred this appeal against his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the IPC) and sentence of imprisonment for life, recorded by IIIrd Additional Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Apr-18-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302/34
AIR2000SC3395; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)879; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)336; 2000CriLJ2463; JT2000(5)SC21; 2000(3)SCALE343; (2000)9SCC88
ORDER1. This appeal has been preferred from the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upholding the appellant's conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The appellant was found guilty by both...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCharan Lal Sahu Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Dec-22-1989
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 39-A, 48-A, 51, 136, 142, 226 and 300; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 151 - Order 1, Rules 4, 8 and 10 - Order 2, Rule 3 - Order 23, Rule 1, 3 to 9 and 36 - Order 32, Rule 7; Fatal Accidents Act, 1846; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 35, 304, 324, 326 and 429; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 - Articles 1, 3, 6, 7 and 8; Wagner-Peyser Act; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 15 and 18; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Bhopal Gas Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11; Immigration and Nationality Act, 1952; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 176(1); Factories Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Ru
AIR1990SC1480; (1990)1CompLJ125(SC); JT1989(4)SC582; 1991(2)SCALE841; (1990)1SCC613; [1989]Supp2SCR597
ORDERSabyasachi Mukharji, C.J.1. Is the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is constitutionally valid? That is the question.2. The Act was passed as a sequel to a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »