Advanced Search Results
Herbertsons Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-18-1996
Service Tax
(1997)(89)ELT553TriDel
1. Appellants manufacture aerated waters which are sold through net-work of dealers. They had filed price list in the required proforma for flavoured drinks as well as for Soda which was approved by the jurisdictional Officer....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Qucxova Sinal Cundo, Through His Power of Attorney Shri Naraina S ...
Mumbai
Jun-20-1997
Commercial
Goa, Daman and Diu Mining Concessions (Abolition and Declaration as Mining Leases) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 19 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 39, 31-C, 129, 141, 240, 300-A and 368; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 7, 8, 9-A and 16; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Goa, Daman and Diu (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 8; Bombay Land Revenue Code; Land Tenure Abolition Laws (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1982; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30; Indian Electricity (Assam Amendment) Ordinance, 1972; Tinsukhia and Dibrugarh Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1972
1998(2)BomCR87
ORDERS.N. Variava, J.1. All these petitions can be disposed off by this common judgment. Facts are by and large common. On behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Zaiwalla and Mr. Chinoy have argued. All the other Advocates...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Apr-10-1992
Excise
Central Excise Act
1992(59)ELT505(Bom); 1993(64)ELT172(Bom)
ORDER1. Rule returnable forthwith, Mr. Sethna waives service for the respondents. By consent petition placed on board and called out for hearing. 2. Heard Counsel for the parties. 3. The impugned order of the Tribunal directing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-01-1992
Customs
1992(3)BomCR416; 1993LC654(Bombay)
Sujata Manohar, J.1. The appellants are the original respondents. They are hereinafter referred to as the respondents. The respondents to the appeal are the original petitioners. They are hereinafter referred to as the petitioners.2. The petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›