Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Advocate: anil wani · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.037 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 18 1996

Herbertsons Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-1996

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1997)(89)ELT553TriDel

1. Appellants manufacture aerated waters which are sold through net-work of dealers. They had filed price list in the required proforma for flavoured drinks as well as for Soda which was approved by the jurisdictional Officer....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1997

Shri Qucxova Sinal Cundo, Through His Power of Attorney Shri Naraina S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-20-1997

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Mining Concessions (Abolition and Declaration as Mining Leases) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 19 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 39, 31-C, 129, 141, 240, 300-A and 368; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 7, 8, 9-A and 16; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Goa, Daman and Diu (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 8; Bombay Land Revenue Code; Land Tenure Abolition Laws (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1982; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30; Indian Electricity (Assam Amendment) Ordinance, 1972; Tinsukhia and Dibrugarh Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1972

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR87

ORDERS.N. Variava, J.1. All these petitions can be disposed off by this common judgment. Facts are by and large common. On behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Zaiwalla and Mr. Chinoy have argued. All the other Advocates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1992

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-10-1992

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1992(59)ELT505(Bom); 1993(64)ELT172(Bom)

ORDER1. Rule returnable forthwith, Mr. Sethna waives service for the respondents. By consent petition placed on board and called out for hearing. 2. Heard Counsel for the parties. 3. The impugned order of the Tribunal directing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 1992

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1992

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR416; 1993LC654(Bombay)

Sujata Manohar, J.1. The appellants are the original respondents. They are hereinafter referred to as the respondents. The respondents to the appeal are the original petitioners. They are hereinafter referred to as the petitioners.2. The petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial