Advanced Search Results

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mysore Iron and Steel Works

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : AIR1949Bom400; (1949)51BOMLR684

M.C. Chagla, C.J.1. This reference raises a very short point as to the construction of Sections 30 and 31 of the Indian Income-tax Act, and the facts necessary to be stated are that the Income-tax Officer...

Daddo Atmaram Patil and ors. Vs. Raghunath Atmaram Patil (Savant) and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 8 and 12

Reported in : AIR1979Bom176; (1980)82BOMLR130; 1978MhLJ739

1. An interesting question of Hindu law arises for determination in this appeal viz.:Is a Shudra illegitimate son (dasiputra) or daughter entitled to succeed to the estate of his or her putative father by way of...

N.P. Nathwani Vs. the Commissioner of Police

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR1

R.M. Kantawala, C.J.1. This petition relates to a very important question regarding basic human natural rights to hold a peaceful assembly of some lawyers who are invited by individual invitations to discuss civil liberties and the...

Sri Y S Basavaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.925/2017 BETWEEN:1. . SRI Y S BASAVAIAH S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH...

In Re: Jot Ram Sher Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : AIR1934All559; 150Ind.Cas.197

Niamatullah, J.1. This is an application by a firm styled Sher Singh Joth Ram of Muzaffarnagar, under Section 66(3), Income-Tax Act, for an order requiring the Commissioner of Income-Tax to state a case and to refer...

Jot Ram Sher Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, United Provinces.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1934]2ITR129(All)

The following judgments were delivered.NIAMATULLAH, J. - This is an application by a firm styled Jot Ram Sher Singh of Muzaffarnagar, under Section 66 (3) of the Income Tax Act, for an order requiring the Commissioner...

Bharath Kumar JaIn Vs. Kanta Ben

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, 1969, 1972 -- Sections 10(1and 2), 14 to 16, 20(1), 30(1 and 2), 39 and 40; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 -- Sections 47, 115 and 151; U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, rend and Eviction), Act, 1972 and 1973; Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC111; (1998)IIMLJ156

ORDER1. The present revision has been preferred against the fair and decretal order dated 31.3.1997 in E.A.No.827 of 1997 in E.P.No.1721 of 1996 in O.S.No.5485 of 1994 on the file of the IX Assistant Judge, City...

Tejmal Bhojraj Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 195222ITR208(Nag.)

This is an application under Section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The assessee is a trader of Malkapur. In the assessment year 1943-44 for the account year ending Diwali 1942, the assessee did not produce...

Balasaheb Anandrao Ghatge Vs. Jaimala Sahaji Raje Angre and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 16; Bombay Pargana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1978Bom44; (1979)81BOMLR105; 1977MhLJ777

ORDER1. The present civil revision application arises out of an application made by the revision-applicant Balasaheb Anandrao Ghatge for a succession certificate. The matter has a chequered history and the point involved, though a narrow one,...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Vs. Mysore Iron and Steel Work ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1949]17ITR478(Bom)

CHAGLA, C.J. - This reference raises a very short point as to the construction of Section 30 and 31 of the Income-tax Act and the facts necessary to be stated are that the Income-tax Officer made...