Advanced Search Results

Smt. Lata Mahendra Parekh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR221

N. Arumugham, J.1. By filing this writ of habeas corpus petition, the detenu Smt. Lata Mahendra Parekh who was detained by an order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent vide detention order No. PSA 1097/60/SPL-3(A)...

Kapil Chopra Vs. Kunal Deshmukh and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

CHIEF JUSTICE Greed and deceit are two human traits which are very often part of the stories of Hindi films. These traits also seem to be writ large on the defence of Respondents 1 and 2,...

Torrent Power Ltd., Old Agra Road, Anjur Phata, Bhiwandi, Dist. Thane ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member 1) This appeal arises out of order/award dated 07/03/2009 passed in Consumer complaint No.299/2008 Shyamprasad S.Bandivadekar V/s Torrent Power Ltd., passed by District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Thane...

Tarachand Gupta and Bros. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1971)73BOMLR558

Kotval, J.1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal against the dismissal of their suit to recover a sum of Its. 45,100 from the Union of India represented by the Collector of Customs, Bombay. The suit came to...

Arun Kautik Pawar Vs. Sau Laxmi Arun Pawar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 15 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(3) - Schedule - Article 123

Reported in : 1985(2)BomCR619; (1985)87BOMLR670; 1985MhLJ743

P.B. Samant, J.1. These two matters arise under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and raise three questions of law, two of which are common to both. Hence they are heard...

Sharnappa V. Patrika Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1984)86BOMLR106

M.N. Chandurkar, Acting C.J.1. All these three petitions challenge the validity of the land acquisition proceedings in connection with what has come to be known as 'the Lower Terna Project,' The notification under Section 4 of...

Meena Mahendra Vakharia Vs. K.L. Verma and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR764

A.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Shri Karmali for the petitioner, Shri Agarwal for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and Shri Patil for respondent Nos. 2 and 4.2. The petitioner Smt. Meena is the...

Smt. Saroj Mamdani Vs. State of Maharashtra and 3 ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR162

N. Arumugham, J.1. By filing this writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who is the mother of the detenu by name Karim Kamaluddin Mamdani @ Zahid Hamid Pinwala...

Rizwan and Others Vs. Alleemunnisa Begum

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 10(2), 11 and 32; Uttar Pradesh Rent Act

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD525

1. This revision is directed against the order passed by the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, passed in RA No.272 of 1990 on 22-12-1994 confirming the order passed by the Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad,...

Leaap Forwarders (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Custo ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(9), 35, 45, 50, 146 and 51; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Customs House Agents Licensing Rules, 1984 - Rule 10(2); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973; Indian Explosives Act, 1884; Arms Act, 1959; Opium Act, 1878; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD216; 2001(3)ALT131; 2001(135)ELT58(AP)

ORDERS.R Nayak, J 1. This writ petition is directo), against the Public Notice No.9/2001 Customs dated 3-2-2001 issued by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Guntur (the Commissioner, for brevity), the first respondent herein. 2....