Advanced Search Results

M/S Bharath Earth Movers Gruha Nirmana Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF MARCH, 2016 :PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR :AND: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA W. A. NO.5279/2003 (LA) AND W.A. NOs.5280-5281/2003 (LA) AND...

Sri M.A. Parthasarathy S/O Late M.A. Srinivasan Vs. the Spl. Deputy Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 136(3); Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 2(8), 2(12), 7, 7(1) to 7(3), 8, 8(2), 9(3), 11, 11(2), 12, 12(1), 12(3), 12(5) and 12(6); Mysore Land Revenue Code, 1888; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2009(5)KarLJ203

ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition for a declaration that, the report submitted by the Karnataka Lokayuktha as per Annexure-F is void, nonest and has no probative value and for quashing Annexure- G...

Uday L. Pehekar Vs. Karnataka State Financial Corporation Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2004Kant93; 2004(2)KarLJ231; [2004]53SCL67(Kar)

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J. 1. Petitioner, a borrower from the first respondent- Karnataka State Financial Corporation Ltd. (the Corporation' for short) has approached this Court praying for quashing of a sale deed dated 10-8-2002 executed in...

Mysore Lamp Works Ltd. Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Karnataka Urban Development Authority Act,1937

1. The appellant has preferred this appeal challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and decree passed by the Small Causes & Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Mysore dated 2.8.2007 in O.S.No.751/200 4 the appellant-company is a...

Mysore Lamp Works Ltd. Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Karnataka Urban Development Authority Act, 1937.

1. The appellant has preferred this appeal challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment and decree passed by the Small Causes & Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.J, Mysore dated 2.8.2007 in O.S.No.751/2004. The appellant-company is a public...

Mohankumar, Bangalore Vs. the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore D ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: These petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order passed by the R1, dt.26.12.08, passed in No.SC.ST(a)10/05-06 and No.SC.ST(A)12/05-06 as per Ann-C and further be...

Bharath Earth Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in writ petition Nos.766/97 c/w 37048-49/1995 and 37227-28/95 dated 7-4-2003.) 1. These Writ Appeals...

Kanhaiya Lal Mahto and ors. Vs. Daman Mahto and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 19

Reported in : [2005(2)JCR327(Jhr)]

ORDERNarendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this appeal the appellants have assailed the order dated 23.8.2002 passed by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Dhanbad in Miscellaneous Case No. 1/2002 rejecting the petition filed under Order XLI, Rule...

Anirudh Marik Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 391

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1518; [2003(2)JCR57(Jhr)]

ORDERD.N. Prasad, J.1. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 31-7.2002 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Dumka in Criminal Appeal No. 164 of 1982 whereby and whereunder the learned Appellate Court rejected...

Most. Dilwa Kuer and ors. Vs. Mahipat Singh and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR529(Jhr)]

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the defendants-petitioners have...