Advanced Search Results

Madanlal Nandlal Zawar (Deceased) through his LRs. Vs. Premsukh Ramday ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The appeal is filed against judgment and decree of Special Civil Suit No.130/1974, which was pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar and also against the judgment and decree of Regular Civil...

Kashinath Das and ors. Vs. Kalipada Das

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 211, 212, 213, 215, 439 and 537

Reported in : AIR1953Cal12,56CWN202

P.B. Mukharji, J. 1. The petitioners complained against the order of commitment made by the learned Magistrate on 30-3.1951, wrongly described as 30-1-1951. The petitioners by that order were committed to the Court of Session under...

Niteshwar Prasad Sinha and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6755 of 2011 ….. 1. Niteshwar Prasad Sinha 2. Anil Kumar Vishwakarma 3. Chandrakant Pandey 4. Krishna Kumar Pandey 5. Bibhuti Narayan Deo 6. Prakash...

Sujit Kumar Das and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18

T. Vaiphei, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to refer the L.A. Case No. 1/SN of 95 pending before the...

Radharani Vs. Brindarani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1939)41BOMLR689

George Rankin, J.1. The parties in this case are governed by the Dayabhaga. The appeal is brought by the plaintiffs whose suit, instituted on September 20, 1930, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Dacca,...

Sri. M.S. Subbukrishna S/O. Late M. Suryanarayana and ors. Vs. Smt. Pa ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 20; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13 and 24

Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ438

H.N. Nagamohan Das, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the common judgment and decree dated 01.12.2005 in O.S. No. 7/2000 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Srirangapatna, partly decreeing the suit of...

Pratap Karan and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by Its P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 20, Rule 6A, 6A(1), 6A(2) - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 42, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999

Reported in : 2007(4)ALT334

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Vedula Venkatramana and the learned Advocate General.This application is filed to dispense with the certified copy and also the typed copy of the decree made in O.S. No. 155 of 2005....

Mahendra Mahanta and ors. Vs. Smt. Tarini Dei and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 23 and 27; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 44

Reported in : AIR2003Ori180; 96(2003)CLT182

B. Panigrahi, J.1. Defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 in the court of the Subordinate Judge, Baripada in Title Suit No. 3 of 1978-I against the judgment and decree passed in a suit for partition...

Bablu Hembram and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 14(2)

Reported in : AIR1974SC2279; 1974CriLJ1308; (1975)3SCC339

M.H. Beg, J.1. A common question of law arises, on similar facts, in each of the eleven Habeas Corpus petitions which have to be allowed as a result of the judgment of the Constitution Bench of...

Sadhuram Bansal Vs. PulIn Behari Sarkar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 89 - Order 40, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145 and 145(5)

Reported in : AIR1984SC1471; 1984(1)SCALE997; (1984)3SCC410; [1984]3SCR582

Fazal Ali, J.1. This appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court discloses an unfortunate litigation which proves the well-known legal maxim 'delay defeats justice' and arises out of a Will executed...