Advanced Search Results

Mohd. Akram Khan Vs. State of M.P. (Now State of Chhattisgarh)

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32

Reported in : 2005(1)MPHT29(CG)

L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. The appellant namely Mahmood Akram Khan has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 26th February, 1999 passed by...

Naseem Bano and ors. Vs. L.i.C. of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182 and 185; Insurance Act

Reported in : III(2004)BC472; 2004(3)MPHT358; 2004(2)MPLJ22

S.K. Seth, J.1. This appeal by the plaintiff is against the judgment and decree dated 29-10-1993 passed by the Vth Additional District Judge, Indore in Civil Suit No. 142-B/86. By the impugned judgment and decree, the...

Vinayak Ukharda Javare Vs. Madhukar Tulshiram Patil

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner prays to convert the Civil Revision Application into Writ Petition. Liberty granted as prayed for. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent of...

Bongaigaon Stores and anr. Vs. Moolchand Kucheria and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 9; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

I.A. Ansari, J.1. The order under challenge in the present revision was passed, on 20.11.2001, by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bongaigaon, in Misc. (J) Case No. 12/2001, arising out of the Title Suit No....

Sher Mohomed Musahib Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4), 7(1), 52, 60(1) and 62; Societies Registration Act, 1860

Reported in : (1971)73BOMLR349; (1971)IILLJ31Bom

1. This is an application in revision against the judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in an appeal by which he confirmed the order of conviction and sentence passed on the applicant under S....

Marathwada Wakf Board Vs. Shazadi Bi Haseem

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR257

Vaidya, J.1. [His Lordship after narrating facts proceeded.] 2. The Principles of Mahomedan Law relating to the burial ground or Kabarstan;3. Ameer Ali has stated the principles at pp. 406 and 407 of vol. I of...

Sheikh Muntijim S/O Sheikh Dilawar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 100 and 302

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR99

M.S. Ratnaparkhi, J.1. The appellant who was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Extra Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No. 120/83 on a charge under section 302 of Indian Penal Code has...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. A.N. Naik Associates and anr. and Ranga ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Assessable Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(47), 45(3) and 45(4); Finance Act, 1987

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR801; (2004)187CTR(Bom)162; [2004]265ITR346(Bom)

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Both these appeals can be disposed of by a common order as the facts involved are the same and similar questions of law arise. The respondents hereto were parties to a family settlement...

Smt. Razia Begum Vs. A. Venkataratnam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1994)96BOMLR393

G.D. Kamat, J.1. This is a Habeas Corpus (Writ) Petition instituted by the wife of the detenu Abdul Gaffar Khan against whom an Order has been made on 27th of July, 1993 under Section 3(2) of...

T.R. Srikantaiah Setty Vs. Balakrishna and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33, 67, 68 and 69; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 123; Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : ILR1999KAR2953; 1999(5)KarLJ153

1. The defendant 1 has filed this appeal against the judgment and decree of the Trial Court whereby it decreed the suit of the plaintiff/respondent 1 declaring him to be the absolute owner of the suit...