Advanced Search Results

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd vs.jagram & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

to his dependants or any of them.” 9. Workmen’s Compensation Act was again amended in 2009 by Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009 with effect from 18th (Emphasis supplied) FAO5212016 Page 4 of 6 January, 2010 whereby the words “workman” and … no.1 urged at the time of the hearing that respondent no.1 was an “employee” within the meaning of Section 2(1)(dd) of the Employees’ Compensation Act. It was submitted that the definition of “workman” in Section 2(1) (n)

Commanding Officer Railway Protection Special Force Mumbai Vs. Bhavnab ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

virtue of their inclusion in the definition of a “railway servant”.16. It was also submitted that by Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009, with effect from 18.01.2010, the term “Workman” was Civil Appeal No.3592 of 2019 Page 8 of 31 substituted … and, therefore, the claim petition was maintainable. Regarding the amount payable as compensation, applying the formula provided in Section 4 of the 1923 Act, the Commissioner determined the compensation payable as Rs. 4,33,820/- and directed it to be

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., by Its Regional Manager, Bangalore Vs. Gu ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

of W.C. Act against the judgment dated 18.12.2006 passed in KAM/KNP/CR-5/2003 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Kodagu Sub Division, Madikeri, awarding a compensation of Rs.58,738/- with interest at 12%P.A.) 1. These appeals have … against the judgment dated 18.12.2006 passed in KAM/KNP/CR-5/2003 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Kodagu Sub Division, Madikeri, awarding a compensation of Rs.58,738/- with interest at 12%P.A.) 1. These appeals have come up today … the requirements laid down under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 and subsequent amendment including No.30 of 1995 w.e.f. 15.9.1995 of the said Act.” 8. In … Apex Court in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs. Mohd. Nasir reported in 2009 AIR SCW 3717? This court also framed one more substantial question of … pay compensation as and when it falls due. Section 4-A(3)(a) and (b) of the Act provides that

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Nemmara Branch represented by The ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Act deals with Workmen's Compensation (the word Workmen's is substituted by the word Employee's by the Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009). Section 3 of the Act provides that, if personal injury is caused to an employee by accident arising out … I of the Act, i.e., a 'non-scheduled injury', in view of the provisions contained in Explanation II to Section 4(1)(c)(ii) of the Act. 12. Chapter II of the Act deals with Workmen's Compensation (the word Workmen's is substituted

M/S. Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and Others Vs. Mrs. Benedicta A. Fer ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Whether the order of compensation of Rs.3,75,528/- is just and legal in view of amendment of 2009 in section 4 of the Act ?No(3) Whether the respondent/original applicant is entitled to claim compensation as per the terms and … i.e 6th Labour Court. This being an appeal under Section 30 of The Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, (Workmen's Compensation Amendment Act 2009) (Hereinafter referred as “The Act”) Substantial questions of law are as under :-  Findings(1) Whether the Tribunal has

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Nazeema

Court : Kerala

claimed in the claim petition.4. In this context it is also to be noted that before the Workmen's Compensation(Amendment) Act, 2009, which came into force on 18.1.2010, the monthly wages of an employee was statutorily restricted to Rs.4000/-. … on 18.1.2010, the monthly wages of an employee was statutorily restricted to Rs.4000/-. As per the above amendment, Section 4(1)(b) was inserted authorizing the Central Government to issue notification specifying the monthly wages of employees as it may

Brijesh Kumar Verma vs.aurangjeb & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

dependants or any of them.‖ (Emphasis supplied) 31.4. Workmen‟ Compensation Act was again amended in 2009 by Workmen‟s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009 with effect from 18th January, 2010 whereby the words ―workman‖ and ―workmen‖, were substituted with the words ―employee‖ … disability certificate dated 12th April, 2013. Police Station, Maurya Enclave registered FIR No.75 dated 6th March, 2012 under Sectionsagainst the contractor, Gulab Singh (respondent no.2) in which charge sheet has been filed.3. On 22nd August, 2012, respondent

Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rinki and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

concluded that the insurance company/ respondent No.4 is liable to pay only to the extent provided under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 to the claimants/LRs of the deceased driver Shri Nidhish Yadav. The balance would have to … issued by Government of India in exercise of powers under any provisions of the M.V.Act. The circular cannot amend, modify or vary the statutory definition of a motor vehicle as provided in the M.V.Act. There is no … Fire Tender in question is not a motor vehicle as defined under section 2(28) of the Motor Vehicles Act inasmuch as it is a special

Fulmati Dhramdev Yadav Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

14. The act governing the present dispute, i.e., the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, has been, vide The Workmen’s Compensation (Amendment) Act, 2009, amended, by which the word “workmen” has been substituted by “employees” rechristened as the Employees Compensation Act, 1923.15. … it has been urged amongst other grounds, that the Court in First Appeal has transgressed the confines of Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 19235; the vehicle in which the logs were 5 Hereafter, the Act … Kutch Carrier (Sohansing & Sons3), drawing a salary of ₹4000 per month. 4.Such employment of the deceased was denied by the insurer for lack of

Venkatesh Vs. M.K.Udayakumar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

be as per Schedule I under Workmen's Compensation Act”23. The above said amendment has been inserted in the year 1994. Though there is escalation in … or "default" is not on the claimant. The matter however does not end with this. A perusal of sub-section (4) of Section 140 of the Act further reveals, that the claim of compensation under Section 140 of the … For the purposes of this sub-section, "permanent disability" shall have the same meaning and extent as in the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (8 of 1923). (2) In any claim for compensation under sub- section (1), the claimant … Supreme Court in Ningamma Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., reported in 2009 (13) SCC 710.has held as follows 14. Section 163-A of the MVA