Advanced Search Results

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shakura Ishaq Bhaya and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(5), 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2), 4A(3), 4(2), 10(1), 10A(1)(2)(3) 19, 19(1) and 22; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 10, 10A, 10B, 15, 15A, 16, 18, 18A and 19; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1) and 39(2); Workmen's Compensation (Amended) Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2008ACJ2711; (2008)1GLR327

finding:2.14 The trial Court held that all applicants are workmen in view of Section 2(n) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. All the workmen have died during their course of employment and part of their duty when the accident … compensation. Section 9 provides compensation not to be assigned, attached or charged. Section 10 provides notice and claim. Section 10A provides power to require from employers statements regarding fatal accidents. Section 10B provides reports of fatal accidents and

Mayfield Estate Nallakottah Nilgiris Vs. Krishnan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 3, 4, 9, 10(1), 10(A), 10A(4) and 22; Workmen's Compensation Rules, 1924 - Rules 8 and 20 to 26

Reported in : [1984(48)FLR102]; (1985)ILLJ483Mad; (1983)IIMLJ439

of the provisions of the Act which have appeared on the issue raised in this appeal. The Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), is one to provide for the payment by certain classes of employer … is not a case of suo motu enquiry in which event S. 10A of the Act will apply. Therefore, where the party wants to invoke … and may give them such other further information as he may think fit.' By a reading of this section, it is clear that the Commissioner has no power at all to fix the amount of compensation or

B. Rowell Roy Vs. Ka Thili Nonglyer

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 10A

G. Mehrotra, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act (Act 8 of 1923) against an order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, United Khasi-Jaintia Hills, Shillong. It … P. W. D. contractor, Sri B. Rowell Roy the appellant. Notice was accordingly issued on the contractor under Section 10A of the Workmen's Compensation Act on 18-6-1956. The contractor, in reply to the notice, denied his liability to

Smt. Rajni Rani and ors. Vs. Om Prakash and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4A, 4A(3) and 10A

Reported in : 1992ACJ805; [1992(65)FLR800]; (1993)ILLJ619P& H; (1992)102PLR1

directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 81,540 as death compensation as per Schedule IV to the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter called 'the Act').2. The material facts giving rise to the present appeal may be stated at the … 1 is not liable to pay penalty and interest. In support of his argument, he has relied upon Section 10A of the Act, Amarnath Baldev Raj v. Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, (1981) ACJ 14, and Vijay

Lakhmichand Balchand Vs. Executive Engineer, Division No. 1, Nagarjuna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ19AP

of compensation is made, a notice to the employer is also necessary under Section 10A of the Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923) hereinafter called the Act, apart from a notice to the principal employer in the case.

Kunchali Rudrani Vs. Baby

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1979)ILLJ306Ker

in the course of his employment. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation apportioned under Section 8(5) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter mentioned as the Act) the compensation-amount of Rs, 6,000 deposited by the employer under Section 10A(2) of

Siddharth Sambhaji Survase Vs. Air India Charters Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the deceased Workman was not considered as a ground to absolve the employer of his liability under the Workmen 's Compensation Act. 9. Fifth ruling referred by Shri Naidu is Shah Vs Rajankutty LAWS(KER)-2005-7-68. In this case, the advance payment … taken up for final hearing by consent. The appeal is preferred under Section 30(1) (c) of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923(hereinafter referred to as 'Act'.) Heard submissions at the bar at length with reference to the compilation filed on … person may be recovered in the manner hereinafter provided in section 31. 10A. Power to require from employers statements regarding fatal accident (1) Where Commissioner

Ram Dulari Vs. H.P. State Electricity Board and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1987)ACC199

dismissed as not maintainable and further stating as follows :That the defendant-applicant has defied the mandatory provisions of Section 10A of Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 and the Rules framed there under particularly Rule 6 of the Act aforesaid … appeal by the original claimant (mother of the deceased workman) is instituted under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') against that part of the award of the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation

The Divisional Manager, Vs. Sayeeda Khanam, W/o. Late Azam Kha,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

the claimant in the application filed under Section 22 read with Section 10A(2) of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, wherein it is contended that, the … Patil and another, reported in 2017 (2) KCCR1691, wherein this Court has discussed Section 2(1)(n) of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, and the claimant working as driver of the Jeep belonging to mother of claimant and held that, there … THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED2107.2011 PASSED IN W.C.NO.59/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMENS COMPENSATION, KOPPAL DISTRICT, KOPPAL, AWARDING THE COMPENSATION OF Rs.4,15,960/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF12 P.A. FROM THE … THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE23d DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH MFA No.25711/2011 (WC) BETWEEN:

The Asstt. Engineer, Phed Vs. Mohammed Hussain

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2000(1)WLC578; 1999(1)WLN693

Mr. J. Gehlot, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. This is an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. There are two orders which are challenged in this appeal. One is the order dated 4.12.1991 passed ex-parte … Parties to appear before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Bikaner, on 25.10.1999. Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 10A(4), 23, 25--Award--Validity--No oral evidence recorded--No order passed for taking evidence on affidavit--Provisions of Section 25 also not complied