Advanced Search Results

Sabu M Jacob vs Union of India, Represented by the Secretary,

Court : Kerala

of the State of Tamil Nadu, in terms of the provisions contained in Sec.11 and Sec.48A of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, etc.6. The gist of the grounds urged by the petitioner are to theeffect that Sec.11 of the … AND CHIEF WILDLIFE WARDEN,FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, PIN - 600009 8 THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND FIELD DIRECTOR, SRIVALLIPUTHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR, TAMIL NADU, … anything contained in any other law for the time being in force and subject to the provisions of Chapter IV,-(a) the Chief Wild Life Warden may, if he is satisfied that any wildanimal specified in Schedule I

Dr.R.K.Somasekharan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

of vermin. 2.9. The legal provisions for objective management of human wildlife conflict are:-(i) Section 11(1)(a) of the wildlife (protection) Act 1972authorises the Chief wildlife Wardens to permit hunting of any wild animal specified in schedule-I if it has … anything contained in any other law for the time being in force and subject to the provisions of Chapter IV.-(b) the Chief Wild Life Warden or the authorized officer may, if heis satisfied that any wild animal … dealing with problematic wild boars. A true copy of letter No. F.No. 8-31/2020-WL is produced herewith and marked as Annexure R4(l).15. It is submitted that

Zavaray S. Poonawalla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through Secretary of L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CustomsEnvironment

Acts : Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960; Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972; Foreign Trade Regulation Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 124

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR411; 2003(5)BomCR46; 2002LC121(Bombay); 2003(159)ELT44(Bom)

other laws enacted by the Government of India such as, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, etc. Thus, apart from being a party to CITES, there are several legislations enacted in India to … Regional Deputy Director (W.R.) and Asstt. CITES Management authority in India informed the Petitioner that under Section I, Chapter I of the Import Policy, no skins or tiger or any other cat species can be permitted to … Deputy Director (WR) and Asstt. CITES Management authority by a letter dated 8th November, 2002 informed the Joint Commissioner of Customs that items of Panthera

Suman Chakravarthy vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

that it is not permissible to carryout any construction activity in view of the statutory provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 as well as Environment Protection Act 1986. No appeal has been preferred against this order according to … 1986 is an Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected therewith. Chapter II of the Act deals with general powers of the Central Government.” W.P.(C).No.24545/2015 5539. Scrutiny of the above … GOVERNMENT OF KERALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. W.P.(C).No.24545/2015 2 * 8 LAWYERS ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS FORUM (LEAF)REGISTER NO. ER-344/97, KERALA HIGH COURT ADVOCATES' ASSOCIATION,

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

26.03.2012 with directions to Tata HDCL to comply with the requirements spelt out in Environment (Protection) Act and Wildlife (Protection) Act for obtaining grant of necessary clearances/sanctions/permissions from the competent authorities. xix. In its meeting held on 26.04.2012, it … 30.05.2008, the powers under Section 10 of the Periphery Control Act, 1952 as well as the powers under Chapter VIII to X of PRTP&D Act, 1995 were delegated by the Governor of Punjab to Principal Secretary to … The Registry of this Court as well as the Registry of the 8. the High Court of Punjab and Haryana are directed to transmit respective

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

26.03.2012 with directions to Tata HDCL to comply with the requirements spelt out in Environment (Protection) Act and Wildlife (Protection) Act for obtaining grant of necessary clearances/sanctions/permissions from the competent authorities. xix. In its meeting held on 26.04.2012, it … 30.05.2008, the powers under Section 10 of the Periphery Control Act, 1952 as well as the powers under Chapter VIII to X of PRTP&D Act, 1995 were delegated by the Governor of Punjab to Principal Secretary to … The Registry of this Court as well as the Registry of the 8. the High Court of Punjab and Haryana are directed to transmit respective

Sanjay Vithal Das Sampat vs Government of India

Court : Kerala

Central Government to examine the issue of inclusion of sandalwood : 10 : in Schedule VI of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. The Apex Court also directed the Central Government to formulate a policy for conservation of sandalwood. The … and private lands were drastically reduced.7. In 2010, the Kerala Forest Act was amendedincluding Chapter 6A in the Act. Chapter 6A puts restriction on cutting and sale of sandalwood trees, possession and transport of sandalwood and sandalwood oil … petitions are therefore dismissed. Sd/- N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/29.03.2021 W.P.(C) No.32302/2013 & 8713/2015 :22: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21156/2018 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF

Sanjay Vithal Das Sampat vs Government of India,

Court : Kerala

Central Government to examine the issue of inclusion of sandalwood : 10 : in Schedule VI of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. The Apex Court also directed the Central Government to formulate a policy for conservation of sandalwood. The … and private lands were drastically reduced.7. In 2010, the Kerala Forest Act was amendedincluding Chapter 6A in the Act. Chapter 6A puts restriction on cutting and sale of sandalwood trees, possession and transport of sandalwood and sandalwood oil … petitions are therefore dismissed. Sd/- N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/29.03.2021 W.P.(C) No.32302/2013 & 8713/2015 :22: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21156/2018 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF

Sansar Chand. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Section 55; Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 51; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 313

the natural environment including the wild life.9. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 was enacted for this constitutional purpose. Chapter III of the said Act prohibits hunting of wild animals except in certain limited circumstances. Chapter IV enables … destroying the ecological chain and ecological balance in our environment.4. The appellant herein has been convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 by all the three courts below and now he is in appeal before us.5. Before dealing with … that the appellant's younger brother Narayan Chand is mentioned in FIR No. 82/2005, Kamla Market Police Station, New Delhi, involving the seizure of, inter alia,

Centre for Environment Law, Wwf-i Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

first phase of the project. Necessary sanction has already been obtained to declare Kuno as Sanctuary under the Wildlife Protection Act. MoEF has already granted its approval under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act for diversion of 3395.9 … genetic contamination and where genetic swamping has occurred, to phase out such swamping, was also highlighted. NWAP, in chapter IV, has highlighted the necessity to the restoration and management of degraded habitats outside the protected areas. 35. … Raghu Chundawat and carried out the prey assessment exercise from 2.1.2005 to 8.1.2005 and 8.2.2005 to 13.2.2005. A report was filed in June 2006 (July