Advanced Search Results

Balakrishnan P. vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

worship, burial grounds, burning ghats or village roads or one kilometre from the boundaries of National Park or Wildlife Sanctuaries except with the previous permission of the authorities concerned or the Government or the competent authority; Provided … Rule 2 of the Rules of 2015 defines‘environmental clearance’ to mean the environmental clearance issued under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or the rules made thereunder. Clause (ix)(a) of Rule 2, inserted by Kerala Gazette notification dated 23.06.2017, … one executed in Form H, as per the requirements of Rule 32, Chapter V of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1967. The internal pages … a qualified person recognised in this behalf by the W.P.(C)No.23323 of 2018 63Government or the Director of Mining and Geology or by any recognised person

National Assn. of Home Builders Vs. Defenders of Wildlife

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife - 06-340 (2007) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2006 NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE SUPREME COURT OF … circuit No. 06-340. Argued April 17, 2007-Decided June 25, 2007 Under the Clean Water Act (CWA), petitioner Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initially administers each State’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program, but CWA §402(b) provides … to the Secretary’s reasonable interpretation” of the ESA, Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. , 515 U. S. 687 , 703. Deference … that the agency action will not jeopardize any species. See, e.g. , 63 Fed. Reg. 51199 (1998) (noting that FWS rendered a “no jeopardy” finding

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

26.03.2012 with directions to Tata HDCL to comply with the requirements spelt out in Environment (Protection) Act and Wildlife (Protection) Act for obtaining grant of necessary clearances/sanctions/permissions from the competent authorities. xix. In its meeting held on 26.04.2012, it … 30.05.2008, the powers under Section 10 of the Periphery Control Act, 1952 as well as the powers under Chapter VIII to X of PRTP&D Act, 1995 were delegated by the Governor of Punjab to Principal Secretary to … public notice was issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 63(1) of PRTP&D Act, 1995 as amended by Act 30 of 2006. xxxiii.

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

26.03.2012 with directions to Tata HDCL to comply with the requirements spelt out in Environment (Protection) Act and Wildlife (Protection) Act for obtaining grant of necessary clearances/sanctions/permissions from the competent authorities. xix. In its meeting held on 26.04.2012, it … 30.05.2008, the powers under Section 10 of the Periphery Control Act, 1952 as well as the powers under Chapter VIII to X of PRTP&D Act, 1995 were delegated by the Governor of Punjab to Principal Secretary to … public notice was issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 63(1) of PRTP&D Act, 1995 as amended by Act 30 of 2006. xxxiii.

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

The Indian Forests Act, 1927.2. The Coffee Act, 1942.3. The Rubber Act, 1947.4. The Tea Act, 1953.5. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1980.6. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.7. The Spices Board Act, 1986.8. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002. These Central … as under:"53. Legislation for giving effect to International Agreements - notwithstanding anything in the forgoing provisions of this chapter, Parliament has power to make any law for the whole or any of the Territory of India for … boundaries in accordance with the management plans based on sound scientific principles." 63. The provisions of the Act as has been noted above do not

Sri. S. S. Ganesh Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

NO.933/2022) REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN ARRAIGNED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND2FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.51 OF THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE ACT1972AND SEC. 465 AND201OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE Ld.II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC DAVANAGERE. … of 2022 for offences punishable under Sections 39, 40, 48(a), 49(b), 50, 51, 55(b) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). 7 (b) Mr. Senthil was interrogated and thereafter, he … to notice the procedure stipulated for investigating the offences under the Act. Chapter-3 deals with registration of FOC which is akin to FIR, which also

Sri. Sampanna Mutalik Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

NO.933/2022) REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN ARRAIGNED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND2FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.51 OF THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE ACT1972AND SEC. 465 AND201OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE Ld.II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC DAVANAGERE. … of 2022 for offences punishable under Sections 39, 40, 48(a), 49(b), 50, 51, 55(b) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). 7 (b) Mr. Senthil was interrogated and thereafter, he … to notice the procedure stipulated for investigating the offences under the Act. Chapter-3 deals with registration of FOC which is akin to FIR, which also

Mr. S S Mallikarjuna Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

NO.933/2022) REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN ARRAIGNED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND2FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.51 OF THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE ACT1972AND SEC. 465 AND201OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE Ld.II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC DAVANAGERE. … of 2022 for offences punishable under Sections 39, 40, 48(a), 49(b), 50, 51, 55(b) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). 7 (b) Mr. Senthil was interrogated and thereafter, he … to notice the procedure stipulated for investigating the offences under the Act. Chapter-3 deals with registration of FOC which is akin to FIR, which also

California Vs. Ferc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

licensee to submit studies recommending a permanent minimum flow rate, after consulting with federal and state fish and wildlife protection agencies. Ibid. In 1985, the licensee submitted a report recommending that FERC adopt the interim flow rates as … FERC consider a project's effect on fish and wildlife as well as "power and development purposes." Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, Pub.L. 99-495, 100 Stat. 1243, 16 U.S.C. §§ 797(e), 803(a)(1). FERC issued the 1983 license and … States and the Federal Government. That section provides: "Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed as affecting or intending to affect or in any … cfs during the remainder of the year. 23 FERC Ś 62,137, at 63,204. The license also required the licensee to submit studies recommending a permanent

Sachu Rajan Eapen vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to give a direction prohibiting mining activities upto a certain distance from the boundaries of national parks or wildlife sanctuaries. Therein, the Hon'ble Apex Court has also considered the power of the Central Government under rule 5 … NGT Act, 2010, the Tribunal exercising appellate jurisdiction cannot strike down rules or regulations made under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and therefore, relying upon the said proposition, it was contended that it would be fallacious to state … special connotation acquired by the word 'cognizance'. Once that interpretation is accepted, Chapter XXXVI along with the heading has to be understood in that light. … 684. 62 JIBASH S. KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 63 OMANA KURIJITHOPE, KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 64 RASMITHA