Advanced Search Results

Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962; Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 2(11), 2(31), 2(32), 10, 44(1), 49A, 49B, 49B(1), 49C(7), 51(A), 57 and 304; Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Endangered Species Act

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)

1977 added 'Tibetan Antelope or Chiru (Antelopeshodgsoni)'. The Parliament by an amendment to the Wildlife (Protection) Act incorporated Chapter VA by which it imposed a complete prohibition on the trade inter alias in trophies and animal articles … provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and by the officers of the Wildlife Department under the provisions of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and seizure of 12 pieces of shawls, suspected to be made … is the Collector of Customs, Indira Gandhi International Airport. The respondent No. 3 is the State of Jammu & Kashmir through its Chief Secretary. The

Wildlife Protection Society of India Vs. State of Jandk

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 254, 256 and 356; ;Foreign Trade (Development Regulation) Act, 1992 - Section 500; ;Jammu and Kashmir Wild Life Protection Act, 1978 - Section 43; ;Central Wild Life Protection Act, 1972

Reported in : 2003(2)JKJ598

products is included in the negative list of Import (Chapter 15 part-I) of the Export and Import Policy. Chapter 3 of the Policy defines wild animals as defined in Section 2(36) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 which … of the seizures. This is notwithstanding the fact that Tibetan. Antelope is a protected animal under the Central Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. (for short Central Wildlife Act), and despite the fact that India is a signatory to the Convention

Sansar Chand. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Section 55; Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 51; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 313

the natural environment including the wild life.9. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 was enacted for this constitutional purpose. Chapter III of the said Act prohibits hunting of wild animals except in certain limited circumstances. Chapter IV enables … destroying the ecological chain and ecological balance in our environment.4. The appellant herein has been convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 by all the three courts below and now he is in appeal before us.5. Before dealing with … Book', which once abounded in India, is rarely to be seen today. 3. This case reveals how avaricious and rapacious persons have by organized crime

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

15th April, 1991, again issued by the Lt. Governor of Delhi, this time under Section 18 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 which reads as follows : “No.F2(19)/DCF/90-91/1302-91 Dated :15. 04.91 NOTIFICATION (To be published in Gazette of Delhi) … organization which is recognized and stands chosen by the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) to chair the Indian Chapter of “Leave it to us” and “Eco Movement” campaigns.9. Notice to show cause was issued by this court … GNCTD with Mr. R.A. Iyer and Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Ms. + W.P.(C) 365/2017, CM Nos.1652/2017, 22028-29/2017, 27106/2017, 29105/2017, 33993/2017, 35310/2017 & Rev.P.No.269/2017 DEEPAK BATRA AND

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

15th April, 1991, again issued by the Lt. Governor of Delhi, this time under Section 18 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 which reads as follows : “No.F2(19)/DCF/90-91/1302-91 Dated :15. 04.91 NOTIFICATION (To be published in Gazette of Delhi) … organization which is recognized and stands chosen by the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) to chair the Indian Chapter of “Leave it to us” and “Eco Movement” campaigns.9. Notice to show cause was issued by this court … GNCTD with Mr. R.A. Iyer and Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Ms. + W.P.(C) 365/2017, CM Nos.1652/2017, 22028-29/2017, 27106/2017, 29105/2017, 33993/2017, 35310/2017 & Rev.P.No.269/2017 DEEPAK BATRA AND

Om Prakash Choudhary and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 299

Reported in : AIR2005Raj18; RLW2005(1)Raj167; 2004(4)WLC388

required for constructing Interpretation Center, the position can also be examined with reference to Section 33 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Section 33 reads as follows :'The Chief Wild Life Warden shall be the authority who shall control, … the year 1982, the Department of Environment. Government of India, had also published the National Wildlife Action Plan. Chapter VI commits itself wholly to wildlife education and interpretation. Para 6.1 emphasizes the objective of wildlife education and … The park is rich in vegetation. It is a home for about 379 species of flowering plants. It is a habitat for the worms, insects

Vikash Mahto Vs. The Union of India Through the Secretary Environment ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India under the provisions of Section 38 O (1)(a) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, as per the decision contained in letter dated 02.11.2015 of the Inspector General of Forests (NTCA) with … several conditions.8. We have taken note of the detail framework prescribed under the TCA as contained in its Chapter relating to Core Area Part-A; the Existing Situation and Part-B: the Proposed Management. Buffer Area Part-A: Existing Situation … Government of India 2. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary 3. The Secretary, Forest & Environment Department 4. The Principal Chief Conservator of

V.K. Venkitachalam Vs. State of Kerala, represented by its Principal S ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent is taking all steps for protection and well-being of elephants by implementing the relevant provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Kerala Captive Elephant (Management and Maintenances) Rules, 2012. With regard to the 2012 Rules, it has … but are forced to perform, inflicting pain and suffering, in total violation of S.3 and S.11(1) of PCA Act. Chapter V of the PCA Act deals with the performing animals. S.22 of the PCA Act places restriction on

Jagat Ram Chicham, Madhya Pradesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Thro ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

December, 2006 the State Government has empowered all the Divisional Managers of MPFDC as œWildlife Warden? under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 to deal with wildlife cases. Therefore, the officers of the MPFDC are competent to deal with offence … 10 years from 2008-2009 to 2017-2018. Perusal of the Working Plan reveals that it is divided into various chapters with full details of the forest area handed over to the MPFDC, compartment history, forest type, crop density, … of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at kavita Jabalpur in Writ Petition No. 3219/2013 with a prayer to issue Writ of Mandamus to the Respondent Nos.

Fharukh vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Environment

2023 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 9, 39, 40, 44, 49(B), 49(C),50 R/W SECTION 51 OF WILDLIFE PROTECTION ACT 1972 PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, … by the Central Government; or (aa)Member-Secretary, Central Zoo Authority in matters relating to violation of the provisions of Chapter IV-A; or (ab)Member-Secretary, Tiger Conservation Authority; or (ac)Director of the concerned tiger reserve; or [(ad) the Management Authority … CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102028 OF 2025 BETWEEN: FHARUKH S/O. HUSSAIN PEERA BEVINAMARA AGE: 34 YEARS OCC. PRIVATE WORK RESIDENT OF 2ND WARD, NAGENAHALLI HOSPETE TALUK DISTRICT: