Advanced Search Results

Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962; Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 2(11), 2(31), 2(32), 10, 44(1), 49A, 49B, 49B(1), 49C(7), 51(A), 57 and 304; Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Endangered Species Act

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)

1977 added 'Tibetan Antelope or Chiru (Antelopeshodgsoni)'. The Parliament by an amendment to the Wildlife (Protection) Act incorporated Chapter VA by which it imposed a complete prohibition on the trade inter alias in trophies and animal articles … provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and by the officers of the Wildlife Department under the provisions of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and seizure of 12 pieces of shawls, suspected to be made … carpets and other items in natural and artificial fiber. The petitioner No. 2 Mr. Rajender Kumar Mehta is in charge of the exports of the

Vikash Mahto Vs. The Union of India Through the Secretary Environment ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India under the provisions of Section 38 O (1)(a) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, as per the decision contained in letter dated 02.11.2015 of the Inspector General of Forests (NTCA) with … several conditions.8. We have taken note of the detail framework prescribed under the TCA as contained in its Chapter relating to Core Area Part-A; the Existing Situation and Part-B: the Proposed Management. Buffer Area Part-A: Existing Situation … THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 1615 of 2013 --- Vikash Mahto --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India

Om Prakash Choudhary and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 299

Reported in : AIR2005Raj18; RLW2005(1)Raj167; 2004(4)WLC388

required for constructing Interpretation Center, the position can also be examined with reference to Section 33 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Section 33 reads as follows :'The Chief Wild Life Warden shall be the authority who shall control, … the year 1982, the Department of Environment. Government of India, had also published the National Wildlife Action Plan. Chapter VI commits itself wholly to wildlife education and interpretation. Para 6.1 emphasizes the objective of wildlife education and … Sarun Crane, Siberian Crane, Whitebreasted Waterhen Whitebellied Drongo etc. Out of the 28 main groups of the bird about 18 groups are visible in the

Zavaray S. Poonawalla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through Secretary of L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CustomsEnvironment

Acts : Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960; Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972; Foreign Trade Regulation Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 124

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR411; 2003(5)BomCR46; 2002LC121(Bombay); 2003(159)ELT44(Bom)

other laws enacted by the Government of India such as, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, etc. Thus, apart from being a party to CITES, there are several legislations enacted in India to … Regional Deputy Director (W.R.) and Asstt. CITES Management authority in India informed the Petitioner that under Section I, Chapter I of the Import Policy, no skins or tiger or any other cat species can be permitted to … India signed CITES on 9th July, 1974 and ratified the treaty on 20th July, 1976. Thus, India being a party to CITES, export and import

Jagat Ram Chicham, Madhya Pradesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Thro ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

December, 2006 the State Government has empowered all the Divisional Managers of MPFDC as œWildlife Warden? under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 to deal with wildlife cases. Therefore, the officers of the MPFDC are competent to deal with offence … prayer to issue Writ of Mandamus to the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and restrain the functioning of Respondent No. 4 Madhya Pradesh Forest Development … 10 years from 2008-2009 to 2017-2018. Perusal of the Working Plan reveals that it is divided into various chapters with full details of the forest area handed over to the MPFDC, compartment history, forest type, crop density,

Fharukh vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Environment

2023 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 9, 39, 40, 44, 49(B), 49(C),50 R/W SECTION 51 OF WILDLIFE PROTECTION ACT 1972 PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, … by the Central Government; or (aa)Member-Secretary, Central Zoo Authority in matters relating to violation of the provisions of Chapter IV-A; or (ab)Member-Secretary, Tiger Conservation Authority; or (ac)Director of the concerned tiger reserve; or [(ad) the Management Authority … -1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

Sansar Chand. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Section 55; Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 51; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Section 313

the natural environment including the wild life.9. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 was enacted for this constitutional purpose. Chapter III of the said Act prohibits hunting of wild animals except in certain limited circumstances. Chapter IV enables … destroying the ecological chain and ecological balance in our environment.4. The appellant herein has been convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 by all the three courts below and now he is in appeal before us.5. Before dealing with … of the Act a criminal offence. By the Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 the punishment has been increased vide Section 51 as amended, and the

Sri. Sampanna Mutalik Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

NO.933/2022) REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN ARRAIGNED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND2FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.51 OF THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE ACT1972AND SEC. 465 AND201OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE Ld.II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC DAVANAGERE. … of 2022 for offences punishable under Sections 39, 40, 48(a), 49(b), 50, 51, 55(b) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). 7 (b) Mr. Senthil was interrogated and thereafter, he … to notice the procedure stipulated for investigating the offences under the Act. Chapter-3 deals with registration of FOC which is akin to FIR, which also … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE06H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5952 OF2023C/W CRIMINAL

Mr. S S Mallikarjuna Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

NO.933/2022) REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN ARRAIGNED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND2FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.51 OF THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE ACT1972AND SEC. 465 AND201OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE Ld.II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC DAVANAGERE. … of 2022 for offences punishable under Sections 39, 40, 48(a), 49(b), 50, 51, 55(b) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). 7 (b) Mr. Senthil was interrogated and thereafter, he … to notice the procedure stipulated for investigating the offences under the Act. Chapter-3 deals with registration of FOC which is akin to FIR, which also … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE06H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5952 OF2023C/W CRIMINAL

Wildlife Protection Society of India Vs. State of Jandk

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 254, 256 and 356; ;Foreign Trade (Development Regulation) Act, 1992 - Section 500; ;Jammu and Kashmir Wild Life Protection Act, 1978 - Section 43; ;Central Wild Life Protection Act, 1972

Reported in : 2003(2)JKJ598

products is included in the negative list of Import (Chapter 15 part-I) of the Export and Import Policy. Chapter 3 of the Policy defines wild animals as defined in Section 2(36) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 … of the seizures. This is notwithstanding the fact that Tibetan. Antelope is a protected animal under the Central Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. (for short Central Wildlife Act), and despite the fact that India is a signatory to the Convention