Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: weekly holidays act 1942 section 7 · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 1958

Bhanwar Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-14-1958

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Ajmer Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1956 - Sections 1(3), 2(1), 4, 42 and 43(1); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 239, 245, 254(1) and 366(10); Government of Part 'C' States Act, 1951 - Sections 21 and 22; Weekly Holidays Act, 1942; Government of India Act, 1935

Reported in : AIR1959Raj257

within the Legislative competence of the Legislature of the State of Ajmer, but it could not repeal the Weekly Holidays Act, 1942. The provisions of Section 43 (1) of the Act are void. The provisions of the Act are also … of persons employed in the shop and other commercial establishments. 8. The substantial provisions begin with Chapter III. Section 7 provides that no employee in any establishment shall be required or allowed to work for more than ten

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1956

Sadasivam Vs. State of Madras, by the Asst. Inspector Labour X Circle, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-1956

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 6 and 11; Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 11(1); Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1957Mad144; 1957CriLJ374; (1957)ILLJ524Mad

enactment in this Province regulating the conditions of work of employees in shops, commercial undertakings, restaurants, etc. The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 (Central Act XVIII of 1942) which' has been brought into force from 1st January 1946 is. limited in … from the provisions of Ss. 6 and 7 of the-Act, shops of barbers and hairdressers are inducted. By Section 7 of the Act it is Provided that every-shop and commercial establishment shall remainclosed on the close day, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 1961

ShiravanThe Ananda Rao Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-23-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Mysore Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 11(1), 45 and 45(1); Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 - Sections 6; Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 9; Mysore Shops and Establishments Rules - Rules 37(11) and 40; Constitution of India - Articles 246(2) and 372(1)

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ262Kant

stands repealed as from the date on which the Part B States (Laws) Act came into force. The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 (Central Act XVIII of 1942), was one of the Acts which were extended to Part B States by … the purposes of S. 6 of the Part B States (Laws) Act. 7. The alleged contravention by the petitioner of S. 11(1) of the Mysore … said S. 11(1) stands repealed by virtue of S. 6 of the Part B States (Laws) Act. 4. Section 11(1) of the Mysore Act is as follows : '11. (1) Every shop shall remain entirely closed on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 23 2013

Ruby Recreation Club Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-23-2013

Subject : Right to Information

the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 ( Tamil Nadu Act XXXVI of 1947 ) or the Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 ( Central Act XVIII of 1942 ) whichever is applicable and such other days on which the Collector … use of liquor for Scientific, Industrial and such like purpose Nil FL 7 License for possession and sale of wine, grape juice or other liquor … clubs, selling alcohol/liquor for human consumption holding FL-2 license. The clubs have to obtain a license as per Section 17-C of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), in order to possess

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1962

Young Men's Indian Association Vs. Assistant Inspector of Labour

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-18-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1963)IILLJ588Mad

Section 30 of the Act provides that on and from the date of the commencement of this Act, Weekly Holidays Act, 1942, the Factories Act of 1948 and the Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, shall not apply to catering … v. Cosmopolitan Club 5 S.T.C. 291 and Bengal Nagpur Cotton Mills Club v. Sales Tax Officer 8 S.T.C. 781 which have interpreted the word 'business' in enactments levying sales tax. Actually the interpretation was of the definition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2020

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 2016 [Section 13(1)(j)]., contain provisions similar to what is contained in Section 22(1)(d) of the Act.113. The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 [Section 8(1)(c)]., the Jammu and Kashmir Factories Act, 1999 [Section 9(1)(c)]., contained provisions which confer power on the Authorities … is allowed to stand. There is no bar under the Act to the registration of FIR under CrPC. 7 7. Shri Nagamuthu, learned senior counsel submitted that having regard to the scheme of the Act and Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1984

C.V. Raman and ors. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-18-1984

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 291; Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas126(Mad); (1984)IILLJ34Mad

of work in shops, commercial establishments, restaurants, theatres and other shops and for certain other purposes. Though the Weekly Holidays Act of 1942, Central Act 18 of 1942 had been brought into force in this State from 1st January, … be little a Nationalised Bank being under the Central Government. The investing takes place under section 4. Under section 7, the location of the Head Office and the management must be as per the directions of the Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1959

Public Prosecutor Vs. Shanmugham Pillai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1959)IILLJ802Mad

of 'shop' given in Madras Act is slightly different from the definition given under Section 2(d) of the Weekly Holidays Act, 1942. The definition adopted here makes no distinction between shops carrying retail trade or business and those carrying on … Chapman 1 J.P. 132, so of a carpenter's shop (per Alderson B.R. v. Sanders, 9 C. and P. 79). A blacksmith's shop is not a ' shop ' within Section 15(1) of the Shops Act, 1934-see now

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1984

C.V. Raman Vs. the Management of Bank of India, Regional Office, South ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-18-1984

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1985)2MLJ439

work in the shops, commercial shops, restaurants, theatres and other shops and for certain other purposes. Though the Weekly Holidays Act of 1942, Central Act 18 of 1942, had been brought into force in this State from 1st January, … cannot belittle a Nationalised Bank being under the Central Government. The vesting takes place under Section 4. Under Section 7, the location of the Head Office and the management must be as per the directions of the Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1952

Dindigal SkIn Merchants' Association and Ors. Vs. the Industrial Tribu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-21-1952

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(6) and 226

Reported in : AIR1953Mad102; (1952)2MLJ512

disputes might be referred for adjudication on the four issues relating to basic wages, clearness allowance, bonus and weekly holiday for all workers on Sundays in respect of eight tanneries about which he was able to gather … 20-11-1950 and (3) the Tannery Workers Union, Dindigul, registered in the year 1942. It was banned by Government in September 1949. The ban was lifted … Mr. Narasaraju, the learned counsel for the petitioner raised before me the following points: --1. The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) is vitiated in so far as it affected the fundamental right of … think it is equally clear that in the interests of a large section of the public, namely, industrial workers, Legislature may provide, whether directly or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial