Advanced Search Results

Sadasivam Vs. State of Madras, by the Asst. Inspector Labour X Circle, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 6 and 11; Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 11(1); Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1957Mad144; 1957CriLJ374; (1957)ILLJ524Mad

enactment in this Province regulating the conditions of work of employees in shops, commercial undertakings, restaurants, etc. The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 (Central Act XVIII of 1942) which' has been brought into force from 1st January 1946 is. limited in … 'saloon and serving customers with' the assistance of 12 persons. Therefore, be had been prosecuted and convicted under Section 45(1) of the Act for contravening the provisions of Section 11(1) of the said Act.3. The case for … and had exhibited a notice to that effect in the saloon. 'On 26-9-1955 which was a Monday he was found running the 'saloon and serving

ShiravanThe Ananda Rao Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Mysore Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 11(1), 45 and 45(1); Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 - Sections 6; Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 9; Mysore Shops and Establishments Rules - Rules 37(11) and 40; Constitution of India - Articles 246(2) and 372(1)

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ262Kant

stands repealed as from the date on which the Part B States (Laws) Act came into force. The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 (Central Act XVIII of 1942), was one of the Acts which were extended to Part B States by … Ayyangar, the learned High Court Government Pleader, has appeared for the State. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioner has urged only one contention before … said S. 11(1) stands repealed by virtue of S. 6 of the Part B States (Laws) Act. 4. Section 11(1) of the Mysore Act is as follows : '11. (1) Every shop shall remain entirely closed on

Bhanwar Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Ajmer Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1956 - Sections 1(3), 2(1), 4, 42 and 43(1); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 239, 245, 254(1) and 366(10); Government of Part 'C' States Act, 1951 - Sections 21 and 22; Weekly Holidays Act, 1942; Government of India Act, 1935

Reported in : AIR1959Raj257

within the Legislative competence of the Legislature of the State of Ajmer, but it could not repeal the Weekly Holidays Act, 1942. The provisions of Section 43 (1) of the Act are void. The provisions of the Act are also … Bhandari, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. The petitioners are shopkeepers carrying on business at Ajmer in the erstwhile

Public Prosecutor Vs. Shanmugham Pillai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1959)IILLJ802Mad

of 'shop' given in Madras Act is slightly different from the definition given under Section 2(d) of the Weekly Holidays Act, 1942. The definition adopted here makes no distinction between shops carrying retail trade or business and those carrying on

Grandhi Mangaraju, Manager, Brothers Shop and Branches, Rajam, Srikaku ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(6); Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 11(1)

Reported in : AIR1959AP604; (1959)IILLJ257AP

within the Madras State regulating the conditions of work of employees in shops, commercial undertakings, restaurants, etc. The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942, which was the Central Act, was found limited in scope, as it contained no provisions for regulating hours … Village Munsiff to watch the observance of the weekly holiday and to report breaches of the provisions of Section 11 (1) of the Madras Shops and Establishments Act.The Village Munsiff had apprised the brothers of the instructions … respondent to the writ petition, had visited the main shop on July 26, 1958 and issued directions for its closure on the weekly holiday, The

ZahiruddIn Vs. State of Mysore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Mysore Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 6, 11(1) and 45; Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(6); The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942

Reported in : AIR1957Kant64; AIR1957Mys64; 1957CriLJ984

unconstitutional. 3. In the course of arguments it was brought to our notice that the Central Enactment, The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942, deals with some matters including those dealt with under the Mysore Shops and Establishments Act and that to … his profession or trade is in the nature of public utility service. 2. It appears to us that there is no substance in the petition … Sreenivasa Rao, J. 1. The Petitioner has been prosecuted for an offence under Section 11 (1) read with Section 45 of the Mysore Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, on the ground that

Ruby Recreation Club Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Right to Information

the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 ( Tamil Nadu Act XXXVI of 1947 ) or the Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 ( Central Act XVIII of 1942 ) whichever is applicable and such other days on which the Collector … clubs, selling alcohol/liquor for human consumption holding FL-2 license. The clubs have to obtain a license as per Section 17-C of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), in order to possess

Young Men's Indian Association Vs. Assistant Inspector of Labour

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1963)IILLJ588Mad

Section 30 of the Act provides that on and from the date of the commencement of this Act, Weekly Holidays Act, 1942, the Factories Act of 1948 and the Madras Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, shall not apply to catering … profit out of the activities.3. The assistant inspector of labour, VII Circle, Madras, wrote to the petitioner on 29 September 1959 drawing its attention to alleged contraventions of the provisions of the Act. The petitioner was informed

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 2016 [Section 13(1)(j)]., contain provisions similar to what is contained in Section 22(1)(d) of the Act.113. The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942 [Section 8(1)(c)]., the Jammu and Kashmir Factories Act, 1999 [Section 9(1)(c)]., contained provisions which confer power on the Authorities … shall, for certain offences designate one or more Court of Sessions as a Special Court or Special Courts. Sub-section (2) provides that the Special Court may try an offence other than the offences covered by sub-section (1) which

C.V. Raman and ors. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 291; Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas126(Mad); (1984)IILLJ34Mad

of work in shops, commercial establishments, restaurants, theatres and other shops and for certain other purposes. Though the Weekly Holidays Act of 1942, Central Act 18 of 1942 had been brought into force in this State from 1st January, … applicable to the Nationalised Banks and to the State Bank of India. 2. We would first note the facts leading to Writ Appeals Nos. 561 … Second Additional Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Madras, in the appeal preferred by the employee, C. V. Raman, under section 41 of the Act. 3. Writ Petition No. 2014 of 1979 is for prohibition to prohibit the Additional