Advanced Search Results
Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and Others Vs. Principal Secretary, Revenue ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-23-2015
Land Acquisition
Haryana and Himachal Pradesh where such graveyard has been leased out before the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. (1A) Any sale, gift, exchange, mortgage or transfer of waqf property shall be void ab initio: Provided that … of property, in respect of immovable property owned by the State or Central Government if executed by persons other than those statutorily empowered, cannot be … it were a dispute within the meaning of Section 87 and the provisions of Chapter XII shall apply. Section 46. Extract from the register maintained under Section 43 to be furnished:- (1) The Assistant Commissioner, may on an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSabir Ali Khan Vs. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2023
Land Acquisition
It reads as follows: “112. Repeal and savings. -(1) The Wakf Act, 1954 (29 of 1954) and the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1984 (69 of 1984) are hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under … Collector, is a sequel to Section 51. Section 51(1), inter alia, before its substitution by Act 27 of 2013, read as follows: “51(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the wakf deed, any gift, sale, exchange or mortgage of … otherwise destroys the whole or any part of the Wakf property, the Central Board may apply all or any of the provisions of this Act … found that it did not make any difference to the application of 46 Article 134B, if the transfer is made on the basis that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Priyadarshini Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Lakshmichand Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. B. Giridhar Shanbhog Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Parvathi Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH Kumaraswamy Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri S Anneyappa Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Shivalingaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shankaramani Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … MITTHULAL AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. 46.(2009) 6 SCC498 SANTOSH KUMAR SATHISHBHUSHAN BARIYAR Vs. STATE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »