Advanced Search Results
Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust Vs. Magnum Developers and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2015
Land Acquisition
notification issued by the Central Government dated 14.05.2015 by which several amended acts sought to repeal including the Wakf Amendment Act, 2013 which came into force on 01.11.2013. According to the learned counsel, the said notification of the Central Government … aforesaid object, necessary provisions have been substituted in the original Act. Clause 40 of the Bill sought to amend Section 83 of the Act relating … granted.3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal granting injunction, the defendant-respondents moved the High Court under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 by way of civil revision, which was registered as C.R. No.395 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and Others Vs. Principal Secretary, Revenue ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-23-2015
Land Acquisition
Haryana and Himachal Pradesh where such graveyard has been leased out before the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. (1A) Any sale, gift, exchange, mortgage or transfer of waqf property shall be void ab initio: Provided that … months from the date of registration of wakf property under Section 36, its objections to the Board. 23.7 Section 40 is also relevant, which reads thus: Decision if a property is Waqf property:-- (1) The Board may itself … of property, in respect of immovable property owned by the State or Central Government if executed by persons other than those statutorily empowered, cannot be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.v. Nidhish Vs. Kerala State Wakf Board
Supreme Court of India
Apr-28-2023
Land Acquisition
Reasons to the amendment (of 2013) is extracted below: “The Wakf Act, 1995, [which repealed and replaced the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1984]. came into force on the 1st day of January, 1996. The Act provides for the better administration … into effect by virtue of Section 1 (2) [“It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint”]. on 01.11.2013. As mentioned earlier, as on that date, … “Norman Printing Bureau”, in the waqf building for the last more than 40 years without any right to continue in it. As per Section 56
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Maharashtra State Board Of Wakfs Vs. Shaikh Yusuf Bhai Chawla
Supreme Court of India
Oct-20-2022
Land Acquisition
of auqaf shall be completed within a period of one year from the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (27 of 2013), in case such survey was not done before the commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, … 27.9.2003, under section 5 (1) and sub-section 3 of section 4 of Central Wakf Act, 1995. The corrigendum to the aforesaid Government Gazette notification was … which we have just hereinbefore mentioned submitted its report. It referred to the powers of the Board under Section 40 of the Act to decide whether the properties are Wakf Property or not.9. On 09.03.2005, the Board passed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … 201.3. THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE OF HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA-577 401.4. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER MANDAGADDE RANGE MANDAGADDE POST … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … 201.3. THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE OF HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA-577 401.4. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER MANDAGADDE RANGE MANDAGADDE POST … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … 201.3. THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE OF HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA-577 401.4. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER MANDAGADDE RANGE MANDAGADDE POST … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN B Pooviah Vs. The State Of Karanataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … 201.3. THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE OF HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA-577 401.4. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER MANDAGADDE RANGE MANDAGADDE POST … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … 201.3. THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE OF HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA-577 401.4. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER MANDAGADDE RANGE MANDAGADDE POST … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMvc Hanumanthaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … 201.3. THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE OF HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA-577 401.4. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER MANDAGADDE RANGE MANDAGADDE POST … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »