Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: wakf amendment act 2013 central section 35 · Page 1 of about 260 results (0.072 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 19 2021

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Suresh Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 19 2021

N B Pooviah Vs. The State Of Karanataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Sri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Mvc Hanumanthaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Sri V G Siddhartha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Mr C V Manjunatha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Adarsh Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Sri Aruachalam Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … a fundamental right, same cannot be taken away. 3504.4 Further contention with regard to procedure as prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial