Advanced Search Results
Maharashtra State Board Of Wakfs Vs. Shaikh Yusuf Bhai Chawla
Supreme Court of India
Oct-20-2022
Land Acquisition
of auqaf shall be completed within a period of one year from the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (27 of 2013), in case such survey was not done before the commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, … 27.9.2003, under section 5 (1) and sub-section 3 of section 4 of Central Wakf Act, 1995. The corrigendum to the aforesaid Government Gazette notification was … referred to as a prelude to the scope of Section 40, which latter provision is, pari materia with Section 27 of the Wakf Act, 1954. Section 39 inter alia reads as under:74. “39. Powers of Board in relation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Of A.p. Vs. A.p.state Wakf Board .
Supreme Court of India
Feb-07-2022
Land Acquisition
1954 Act.30. The 1954 Act was later repealed by the Wakf Act, 199521 and thereafter amended by The Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. Since the issues in the present matter pertain to the period prior to 2013, the relevant statutory provisions … a decision that 1654 acres of land was wakf property. Reliance is placed upon Subhan Shah considering pari-materia Section 27 of the 1954 Act with Section 40 of the 1995 Act that 41 (2002) 5 SCC68570 the Board … law which corresponds to this Act, such law shall stand repealed.28. By Central Act No.34 of 1964, clause (ii) was modified in Section 3(l) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLal Shah Baba Dargah Trust Vs. Magnum Developers and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2015
Land Acquisition
notification issued by the Central Government dated 14.05.2015 by which several amended acts sought to repeal including the Wakf Amendment Act, 2013 which came into force on 01.11.2013. According to the learned counsel, the said notification of the Central Government … granted.3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal granting injunction, the defendant-respondents moved the High Court under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 by way of civil revision, which was registered as C.R. No.395 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Magnum Developers and Others Vs. Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust and Anothe ...
Mumbai
Sep-11-2015
Land Acquisition
President and has been brought into effect in the State of Maharashtra on and from 1.1.1996. 27. The Wakf (Amendment) Bill, 2010 (Bill No.53 of 2010) dated 16.4.2010 was introduced in Lok Sabha. Perusal of the Statement of … of a three member Tribunal contemplated under amended section 83(4). The Principal Act was amended by the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (for short, 'Amendment Act') which came into force with effect from 1.11.2013. The single member Tribunal, therefore, has … the Amendment Act was brought into force. Though the Act is a Central Act, under sub-section (1) of Section 83 power is given to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … the impugned Act, the proceedings can be commenced before the Special Court overlooking the limitation and contrary to Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, where the right to a property gets extinguished if a suit for possession
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … the impugned Act, the proceedings can be commenced before the Special Court overlooking the limitation and contrary to Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, where the right to a property gets extinguished if a suit for possession
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … the impugned Act, the proceedings can be commenced before the Special Court overlooking the limitation and contrary to Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, where the right to a property gets extinguished if a suit for possession
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN B Pooviah Vs. The State Of Karanataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … the impugned Act, the proceedings can be commenced before the Special Court overlooking the limitation and contrary to Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, where the right to a property gets extinguished if a suit for possession
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … the impugned Act, the proceedings can be commenced before the Special Court overlooking the limitation and contrary to Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, where the right to a property gets extinguished if a suit for possession
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMvc Hanumanthaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … the impugned Act, the proceedings can be commenced before the Special Court overlooking the limitation and contrary to Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963, where the right to a property gets extinguished if a suit for possession
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »