Advanced Search Results
P.v. Nidhish Vs. Kerala State Wakf Board
Supreme Court of India
Apr-28-2023
Land Acquisition
Reasons to the amendment (of 2013) is extracted below: “The Wakf Act, 1995, [which repealed and replaced the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1984]. came into force on the 1st day of January, 1996. The Act provides for the better administration … into effect by virtue of Section 1 (2) [“It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint”]. on 01.11.2013. As mentioned earlier, as on that date, … court relied on the definition of “offence” under the General Clauses Act, 1897 (i.e., any act or an omission made punishable by any law for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.Radhakrishnama Naidu and Oth Vs. The Government of andhra Pradesh,re ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-01-2015
Land Acquisition
properties of value of Rs.100/- and upwards of properties held by Endowment, Wakf, Central and State Government Undertakings and the Government. The documents are registered … of Apex Court in State of Rajasthan and others v. Basant Nahata , Section 22-A is introduced through Amendment Act 19 of 2007 and the statement of objects and reasons read with the language of Section 22-A would … AIR1957Madras 472 10 AIR1970Orissa 22 11 AIR1958Patna 193, 12 (2009) 7 SCC36313 2013 (4) ALD42614 AIR1955SC60415 1902 AC47416 2014 (4) ALD35817 2013 1 ALT77418 (2003) … and irrevocable power to attorney relating to transfer of immovable property in any way a compulsorily registerable document. Section 18 provides for optional registration of documents specified therein. Section 22 provides for description of houses and land by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMagnum Developers and Others Vs. Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust and Anothe ...
Mumbai
Sep-11-2015
Land Acquisition
President and has been brought into effect in the State of Maharashtra on and from 1.1.1996. 27. The Wakf (Amendment) Bill, 2010 (Bill No.53 of 2010) dated 16.4.2010 was introduced in Lok Sabha. Perusal of the Statement of … of a three member Tribunal contemplated under amended section 83(4). The Principal Act was amended by the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (for short, 'Amendment Act') which came into force with effect from 1.11.2013. The single member Tribunal, therefore, has … the Amendment Act was brought into force. Though the Act is a Central Act, under sub-section (1) of Section 83 power is given to the … suit in respect of the suit properties?â? The plaintiff filed application dated 18.6.2015 at Exhibit 30 for amending the plaint. Defendants no.1 to 7 resisted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and Others Vs. Principal Secretary, Revenue ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-23-2015
Land Acquisition
Haryana and Himachal Pradesh where such graveyard has been leased out before the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. (1A) Any sale, gift, exchange, mortgage or transfer of waqf property shall be void ab initio: Provided that … of property, in respect of immovable property owned by the State or Central Government if executed by persons other than those statutorily empowered, cannot be … compulsorily registerable and the transactions are treated as illegal transactions of transfer of property held by the Government/Institutions. Section 18 provides for optional registration of documents specified therein. Section 22 provides for description of house and land by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … RAVINDER DEVIDASANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 18.(2018) 2 GAUHATI LAW REPORTS313 STATE OF ASSAM, IN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … RAVINDER DEVIDASANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 18.(2018) 2 GAUHATI LAW REPORTS313 STATE OF ASSAM, IN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr C V Manjunatha Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … RAVINDER DEVIDASANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 18.(2018) 2 GAUHATI LAW REPORTS313 STATE OF ASSAM, IN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdarsh Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … RAVINDER DEVIDASANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 18.(2018) 2 GAUHATI LAW REPORTS313 STATE OF ASSAM, IN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Aruachalam Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … RAVINDER DEVIDASANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 18.(2018) 2 GAUHATI LAW REPORTS313 STATE OF ASSAM, IN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN Kamalasambasiva Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
that impugned Act provides for measures to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other statutory and non statutory bodies owned … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTIONS4 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND10OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS … RAVINDER DEVIDASANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 18.(2018) 2 GAUHATI LAW REPORTS313 STATE OF ASSAM, IN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »