Advanced Search Results
Maharashtra State Board Of Wakfs Vs. Shaikh Yusuf Bhai Chawla
Supreme Court of India
Oct-20-2022
Land Acquisition
of auqaf shall be completed within a period of one year from the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (27 of 2013), in case such survey was not done before the commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, … 27.9.2003, under section 5 (1) and sub-section 3 of section 4 of Central Wakf Act, 1995. The corrigendum to the aforesaid Government Gazette notification was … of notification referred to in sub- Section (9) of Section 14” was inserted by Act 27 of 2013.87. Section 16 enumerates various disqualifications to be members of the Board. Section 17 deals with the meetings of the Board.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Of A.p. Vs. A.p.state Wakf Board .
Supreme Court of India
Feb-07-2022
Land Acquisition
1954 Act.30. The 1954 Act was later repealed by the Wakf Act, 199521 and thereafter amended by The Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. Since the issues in the present matter pertain to the period prior to 2013, the relevant statutory provisions … law which corresponds to this Act, such law shall stand repealed.28. By Central Act No.34 of 1964, clause (ii) was modified in Section 3(l) of … the Rules relating to Endowment promulgated and published in the Government Gazette (Volume 77, M45 in terms of Section 16 of the abovesaid Act reads thus: “445. Grants subject to the condition of service being royal grants will
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLal Shah Baba Dargah Trust Vs. Magnum Developers and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2015
Land Acquisition
notification issued by the Central Government dated 14.05.2015 by which several amended acts sought to repeal including the Wakf Amendment Act, 2013 which came into force on 01.11.2013. According to the learned counsel, the said notification of the Central Government … for interfering with the impugned order in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction.” 16. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and examined the relevant … granted.3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal granting injunction, the defendant-respondents moved the High Court under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 by way of civil revision, which was registered as C.R. No.395 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Magnum Developers and Others Vs. Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust and Anothe ...
Mumbai
Sep-11-2015
Land Acquisition
President and has been brought into effect in the State of Maharashtra on and from 1.1.1996. 27. The Wakf (Amendment) Bill, 2010 (Bill No.53 of 2010) dated 16.4.2010 was introduced in Lok Sabha. Perusal of the Statement of … of a three member Tribunal contemplated under amended section 83(4). The Principal Act was amended by the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (for short, 'Amendment Act') which came into force with effect from 1.11.2013. The single member Tribunal, therefore, has … the Amendment Act was brought into force. Though the Act is a Central Act, under sub-section (1) of Section 83 power is given to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and Others Vs. Principal Secretary, Revenue ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-23-2015
Land Acquisition
Haryana and Himachal Pradesh where such graveyard has been leased out before the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. (1A) Any sale, gift, exchange, mortgage or transfer of waqf property shall be void ab initio: Provided that … 22A(1)(b) documents relating to the sale of property, in respect of immovable property owned by the State or Central Government if executed by persons other than those statutorily empowered, cannot be registered. On being asked whether it … (emphasis supplied) 6.2.1 Further, the learned Judge, in concluding paragraphs 15 and 16, observed thus:- 15. Viewed thus, the stand of the Respondents that the … delivering the documents presented for registration in exercise of the powers under Section 22-A of the Registration Act,1908 (for short Registration Act ?). In those
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.Radhakrishnama Naidu and Oth Vs. The Government of andhra Pradesh,re ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-01-2015
Land Acquisition
been misused through registration of immovable properties of value of Rs.100/- and upwards of properties held by Endowment, Wakf, Central and State Government Undertakings and the Government. The documents are registered with intent to gain or claim … of Apex Court in State of Rajasthan and others v. Basant Nahata , Section 22-A is introduced through Amendment Act 19 of 2007 and the statement of objects and reasons read with the language of Section 22-A would … AIR1957Madras 472 10 AIR1970Orissa 22 11 AIR1958Patna 193, 12 (2009) 7 SCC36313 2013 (4) ALD42614 AIR1955SC60415 1902 AC47416 2014 (4) ALD35817 2013 1 ALT77418 (2003) … in case of the State of Rajasthan v. Basant Nahata (2005(7) Scale 164) wherein Section 22-a of the Registration Act,1908 in its application to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.v. Nidhish Vs. Kerala State Wakf Board
Supreme Court of India
Apr-28-2023
Land Acquisition
Reasons to the amendment (of 2013) is extracted below: “The Wakf Act, 1995, [which repealed and replaced the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1984]. came into force on the 1st day of January, 1996. The Act provides for the better administration … into effect by virtue of Section 1 (2) [“It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint”]. on 01.11.2013. As mentioned earlier, as on that date, … the appellants were not in unauthorized occupation and could be 3 dated 16.05.2005 3 evicted after issuing notice under provisions of the Transfer of Property
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … of the accused guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 4.10 It is also contended that Section 16 violates the doctrine of separation of powers, by usurping judicial function and the well settled law 354 that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … of the accused guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 4.10 It is also contended that Section 16 violates the doctrine of separation of powers, by usurping judicial function and the well settled law 354 that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … of the accused guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 4.10 It is also contended that Section 16 violates the doctrine of separation of powers, by usurping judicial function and the well settled law 354 that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »