Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: wakf amendment act 2013 central section 10 · Page 1 of about 304 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 2015

Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust Vs. Magnum Developers and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

notification issued by the Central Government dated 14.05.2015 by which several amended acts sought to repeal including the Wakf Amendment Act, 2013 which came into force on 01.11.2013. According to the learned counsel, the said notification of the Central Government … Court in the case of M.P. Wakf Board vs. Subhan Shah, (2006) 10 SCC696 15. As noticed above, the High Court in the concluding para … granted.3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal granting injunction, the defendant-respondents moved the High Court under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 by way of civil revision, which was registered as C.R. No.395 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2015

Magnum Developers and Others Vs. Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

President and has been brought into effect in the State of Maharashtra on and from 1.1.1996. 27. The Wakf (Amendment) Bill, 2010 (Bill No.53 of 2010) dated 16.4.2010 was introduced in Lok Sabha. Perusal of the Statement of … of a three member Tribunal contemplated under amended section 83(4). The Principal Act was amended by the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (for short, 'Amendment Act') which came into force with effect from 1.11.2013. The single member Tribunal, therefore, has … the Amendment Act was brought into force. Though the Act is a Central Act, under sub-section (1) of Section 83 power is given to the … suit and for dismissal of the suit. The plaintiff filed application dated 10.6.2015 at Exhibit-19 praying for adinterim order under Order 39, Rules 1 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2015

Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and Others Vs. Principal Secretary, Revenue ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Haryana and Himachal Pradesh where such graveyard has been leased out before the date of commencement of the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. (1A) Any sale, gift, exchange, mortgage or transfer of waqf property shall be void ab initio: Provided that … of property, in respect of immovable property owned by the State or Central Government if executed by persons other than those statutorily empowered, cannot be … by Section 9 is prepared, State Government can proceed to acquire the land in excess of ceiling limit. Section 10 (1) of this Act provides for declaration of a notification in the official gazette giving particulars of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 28 2023

P.v. Nidhish Vs. Kerala State Wakf Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reasons to the amendment (of 2013) is extracted below: “The Wakf Act, 1995, [which repealed and replaced the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1984]. came into force on the 1st day of January, 1996. The Act provides for the better administration … into effect by virtue of Section 1 (2) [“It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint”]. on 01.11.2013. As mentioned earlier, as on that date, … section 13 and shall include a common Waqf Board established under section 106” Some of the new provisions, inter alia, inserted by the amendment- including

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2019

Surender Kumar vs.m Salim

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-25-2019

Subject : Education

dedication is for any purpose recognised by Muslim Law as pious, religious or charitable and as per the Wakf Amendment Act, 2013. A wakf- alal-aulad to the extent to which the property is dedicated for any purpose recognised by Muslim … Eviction Petition E-80497/2016 in Mr.M.Salim vs Surender Kumar filed by the landlord/respondent herein against the tenant/petitioner herein under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act).2. The learned Trial Court vide impugned … owners of the tenanted premises. On a perusal of the Will dated 10.2.1979, this Court finds that respondent No.1 who is the Mutawalli, has been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2022

State Of A.p. Vs. A.p.state Wakf Board .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

1954 Act.30. The 1954 Act was later repealed by the Wakf Act, 199521 and thereafter amended by The Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013. Since the issues in the present matter pertain to the period prior to 2013, the relevant statutory provisions … State, there is in force any law which corresponds to this Act, such law shall stand repealed.28. By Central Act No.34 of 1964, clause (ii) was modified in Section 3(l) of the 1954 Act. The definition of … OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.10769 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.10773 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.10775 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 10776-10777 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.10771 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.10772 OF2016AND CIVIL APPEAL No.10774 OF2016JUDGMENT HEMANT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … of imprisonment exceeding three months shall be passed in case of conviction under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. Whereas, Section 10 of the KLGP Act-2011 prescribes that Cr.P.C. will apply to act so long as it is not inconsistent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Sri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … of imprisonment exceeding three months shall be passed in case of conviction under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. Whereas, Section 10 of the KLGP Act-2011 prescribes that Cr.P.C. will apply to act so long as it is not inconsistent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Mr C V Manjunatha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … of imprisonment exceeding three months shall be passed in case of conviction under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. Whereas, Section 10 of the KLGP Act-2011 prescribes that Cr.P.C. will apply to act so long as it is not inconsistent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Adarsh Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

to curb organized attempts to grab lands, whether belonging to the Government, Wakf or the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, local authorities or other … arise for our consideration:"Whether the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act 38 of 387 2014) and Amendment Act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same … 42.AIR1966SC43 NATHULAL Vs. STATE OF M.P. 43.(2004) 1 SC CASES597 COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. ORIENT FABRICS (P) LTD. 44.(2005) 7 SC CASES203 STAR INDIA … of imprisonment exceeding three months shall be passed in case of conviction under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. Whereas, Section 10 of the KLGP Act-2011 prescribes that Cr.P.C. will apply to act so long as it is not inconsistent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial