Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: wakf act 1995 section 82 · Page 1 of about 294 results (0.065 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 25 2013

M.H.Jawahirullah Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Wakf Act of 1995 and further direct the 1st respondent to strictly follow the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 in constituting the Wakf Board. Writ Petition in W.P.No.27590 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the … and direct the first respondent to constitute a Wakf Board on following the due procedure set out in Section 14 of the Wakf Act, 1995. Writ Petition in W.P.No.33785 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of … from the consistent view taken by this Court in its various pronouncements." 82. In Namit Sharma's case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court took note of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2004

Mahboob Khan Vs. Mohd. Khaja and 4 ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-2004

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 6, 6(1), 6(4), 7, 83, 83(5), 83(8) and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD839; 2005(2)ALT308

Wakf Act, 1995?Point:5. Before answering the point, I would like to refer to the relevant provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995. Section 6 of the Act deals with the disputes regarding wakfs and Section 7 with regard to the power

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2009

A.R.A. Basith Saheb Charitable Trust Vs. Karnataka State Board of Wakf ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-18-2009

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 3, 13, 32, 36, 44, 72, 72(1) and 109

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2403; 2009(4)KarLJ90

of demand notices at Annexures-J, K and 1 or in the alternative to declare Section 72 of the Wakf Act, 1995, as unconstitutional.2. The petitioner A.R.A. Basith Saheb Charitable Trust is a Private Trust located at Mysore Road, Bangalore,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 01 1970

Kurban S/O. Kasimali Kazi Vs. Tasduq Ahmedali S/O. Kasimali Kazi and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-01-1970

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 3; Atiyat Inquiries Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 6; Hyderabad Abolition of Inams Act, 1954

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR79; 2007(3)BomCR613; 2007(4)MhLj486

survey No. 329/1 appears to be as 'Inam'. The Wakf Property is defined under Section 3(r)(ii) of the Wakf Act, 1995, which reads thus:3(r)(ii) 'grants', including mashrut-ul-khidmat for any purpose recognised by the Muslim law as pious, religious or … the petitioner, has invited my attention to 7/12 extract of the land survey No. 329/H/6 admeasuring 01 Hector 82 R. It appears from this 7/12 extract that the name of present petitioner is shown for the area

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2014

Present: Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar Advocate Vs. Dargah Maiji Masjid Committe ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

management and control of the disputed Dargah. It was also found that as per Section 89 of the Wakf Act, 1995, the suit could not have been instituted against the defendants without prior notice of two months which has … Chandigarh Rs.No.3463 of 2013 (O&M) [3].***** under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 82 days. The only reason given in the application for condonation of delay is that the appellant was not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2013

Mirza Khusru Ali Baig and Others Vs. the Greater Hyderabad Municipal C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-2013

Subject : Education

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 37621 o”04. 01.2013 Mirza Khusru Ali Baig and others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,rep. by its Commissioner & another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ashwani Kumar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2013

Mirza Khusru Ali Baig and Others Vs. the Greater Hyderabad Municipal C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-2013

Subject : Education

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 37621 o”04. 01.2013 Mirza Khusru Ali Baig & others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner & another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ashwani...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2013

Sukhdev and ors Vs. the State of M.P. and ors

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

revision under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, (2) Civil Revision No.1502/2002 1908 read with Section 83(9) of Wakf Act, 1995 (in short “Wakf Act”.) has been filed at the instance of defendants no.3, 4 and 5 i.e. Sukhdev, … ground and it was also directed by the revenue authorities that in the disputed land survey no.185 area 82 decimal the plantation should be made. It was observed by the revenue authorities that this land will neither

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2004

Shri Ram Phal and anr. Vs. Shri B.S. Bhalla and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-09-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Land Revenue Act - Sections 41 and 76 to 87; Delhi Land Revenue Rules, 1962 - Rules 49, 63 and 65A; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 20; Delhi Land Revenue (Amendment) Rules, 1989; Constitution of India - Article 215; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 340

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4274; 112(2004)DLT193; 2004(73)DRJ528

the time being in force; (e) vested in a Gaon Sabha; (f) declared as `wakf' property under the Wakf Act, 1954. . . 12. In my opinion sub section (3) of Rule 63 of the Delhi Land Revenue … conclusion possible is that the Petitioner's possession would have been mentioned in the Khasra Girdawari for the year 1995-1996 onwards. It is indeed reprehensible that it necessitated the filing of this contempt petition in 2000 to move

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2007

P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy and ors. Vs. Revamma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Commons Registration Act, 1965 - Sections 22(1) and 53A; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule -Articles 142 and 144; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Schedules - Articles 64 and 65; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1980 - Schedule - Article 1; Land Registration Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2007SC1753; 2007(4)ALD47(SC); 2007(3)AWC2411(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(3)CHN116; JT2007(6)SC86; 2007(4)KarLJ274; 2007(6)MhLj336; (2007)4MLJ912(SC); 2007(6)SCALE95; (2007)6SCC59

the maxim nec vi, nec clam, nec precario has been noticed by this Court in Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Government of India and Ors. : (2004)10SCC779 in the following terms: .Physical fact of exclusive possession and … circumstance, which Clarke LJ in Lambeth London Borough Council v. Blackburn (2001) 82 P & CR 494 refers to: I would not for my part … owner has abandoned the property to the adverse possessor on the acquiescence of the owner to the hostile acts and claims of the person in possession. It follows that sound qualities of a typical adverse possession lie … Angus (1881) 6 App.Cas. 740 from acquiescence. The case concerned interpretation of Section 22(1) of the Commons Registration Act 1965. Section 22(1) defined 'town or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial